A couple things faulty with your thoughts...
1) God didn't feed them the tree of knowledge of morals. He gave them every other fruit except the remaining two. They had a chance themselves to eat the eternal life fruit. God never said anything about not eating from it. But a+e chose to be deceived into eating the fruit of knowledge of morals.
2) if they had no previous knowledge of morals, how could they value what they know not?
3) just because I don't agree that man is a better parent doesn't mean I'm not a thinker, it just means I'm not an errant thinker.
1) God didn't feed them the tree of knowledge of morals. He gave them every other fruit except the remaining two. They had a chance themselves to eat the eternal life fruit. God never said anything about not eating from it. But a+e chose to be deceived into eating the fruit of knowledge of morals.
2) if they had no previous knowledge of morals, how could they value what they know not?
3) just because I don't agree that man is a better parent doesn't mean I'm not a thinker, it just means I'm not an errant thinker.
