(January 18, 2022 at 7:49 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: @emjay it wasn’t anything in response to your personal take on PZ’s; I just always hear the argument prefaced with that assumption and I’m not quite sure I entirely follow it, that’s all. 🙂 Like, I can imagine a rainbow-farting unicorn. How does it follow that because I can conceive of it, a unicorn that farts rainbows is logically possible? I don’t get it.
Yeah, no worries... I just said that just in case... just to clear up any possible confusion And yeah I think I agree with what you're saying... especially perhaps because our conceptions are often fuzzy for want of a better word, so just from a brain imagery point of view, just because we can imagine something doesn't make it a logically coherent concept. But if conception means creating a logically coherent concept, then I'd think that by definition it would be logically possible? Not necessarily feasible/probable but possible, yes? Or am I misunderstanding you?