RE: A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?
February 26, 2022 at 6:03 pm
Lame. 2 doesn't follow from 1. 5 is a bare assertion and causes dependent arguments to beg the question.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|