A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?

[Belacqua]

You had written:
“Therefore souls are not material, but always exist with matter. Matter always has a form, form can't exist without matter.”


I don’t know what hylomorphism is so I did a weeb search and clicked on the wikipedia link.

Generally speaking, hylomorphism isn't saying anything remarkable. It's just unremarkably true. The issue is more to do with the Aristotelian vocabulary being outdated.

I think Furrysuicide has effectively argued that hylomorphism doesn't do the thing that no one has ever claimed it does. 

Another proud graduate of Three Minutes of Googling University.