RE: A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?
March 9, 2022 at 5:22 pm
I always find this does well against all claims that God exists:
(1) If God exists then God gave people free will
(2) For God to give people free will then free will must be possible
(3) But free will isn't possible
(4) So God can't give people free will
(5) So God cannot exist.
The form is something like if X then Y if Y then Z not Z so not Y not Y so not X
(1) If God exists then God gave people free will
(2) For God to give people free will then free will must be possible
(3) But free will isn't possible
(4) So God can't give people free will
(5) So God cannot exist.
The form is something like if X then Y if Y then Z not Z so not Y not Y so not X
Schopenhauer Wrote:The intellect has become free, and in this state it does not even know or understand any other interest than that of truth.
Epicurus Wrote:The greatest reward of righteousness is peace of mind.
Epicurus Wrote:Don't fear god,
Don't worry about death;
What is good is easy to get,
What is terrible is easy to endure
