A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?

[Deesse23]

And this has ab.so.fucking.lutely nothing to do with Kennedy, Cuba, Nato or Hamilcar Barca for that matter.

Just so that we are clear, I do not agree with what Putin is doing in the Ukraine, nor do I agree with Kennedy's escalations during the Cuban missile crisis, nor do I agree with the Reagan administration's involvement in Nicaragua, nor Turkey's conflict with Armenia; my list goes on and on.  (I also believe that the United States should have allowed the Confederacy to secede, but, that's for another thread.)

Then why did you mention how Russia was invaded in the past 300 years? Why mention how a few American troops were in Russia a hundred years ago, in a conversation about the russian invasion of Ukraine. Why did you mention the Cuba crisis when i challenged you for (alleged) russian invasion apologetics? Why defending a position you now claim do dont hold?

What was your original point in posting this? 

---

...and that is a justification of what?
Russia (and its allies) has attacked the Ottoman Empire in the past 300 years numerous times, conquering Ukraine, Crimera, et al.

What’s wrong with attacking the Ottoman Empire?
It’s been well established that turks are invaders in Asia Minor. There were already well established nations on those lands and the turks invaded, killed off people and took over.

Whats wrong with attacking Russia?
It’s been well established that Russians are invaders in Ukraine and Crimea. There were already well established nations on those lands and the Russians invaded, killed off people and took over.

According to local rules, I am not allowed to kill my neighbor and take his house and other belongings. Why is it that on the international level, this is acceptable?

Please point out the article in the UN charter, the article which says that invasions of other nations are acceptable.