RE: Less anger towards religion
December 13, 2022 at 11:26 pm
(This post was last modified: December 13, 2022 at 11:28 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Which is a complete non-sequiter since I have made no theological claims.Yes, you did your whole case at its heart is a theological case as there as hell is no non-religious case...
Quote:The way I see it, my points stand because replies are too busy impuning my motives rather than deal with the philosophical implications of the plain facts about what abortions are and what they do.Your point has been trampled into the dust and everyone dealt with your so-called "philosophical implications" so all that's left is your regressive religious irrationalism.
Quote: From what I understand the first 14 days from fertilization are IMHO ontologically vague enough to warrant some measure of epistemic humility and consequent political moderation on my part.Nope, it doesn't matter if it's the first 14 days or the first 14 seconds. Life does not begin at conception and no amount of being alive gives one the right to dwell in someone else's body. This has all been dealt with already.
Quote: So all of those of you projecting your partisanship at me can go stuff it.Nope it's not a projection it's a fact and you can stuff it in your pipe and smoke it Neo...
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM