I agree, they should have put money into advertisement and explained the reason for needing the change. There are lots of ways of handling this issue without adding a charge. I was merely commenting on the fact that the reasoning given in the article is perfectly valid. I don't know if it was the reasoning they used, if they were just being greedy, or if the people behind the decision were simply being lazy. Nobody other than the people who made the decision knows that.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 3, 2025, 3:04 am
Thread Rating:
Greedy Corporate Cocksuckers Smacked Down
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)