(August 23, 2025 at 4:19 pm)Alan V Wrote: Here are the last several paragraphs from Angrboda's linked article:I must assume assume she means can help people think more clearly, and is more likely to help people think more clearly, lest we forget, William Lane Craig is a philosopher, apparently.
Quote:What still isn’t known
While our results point to real growth in students’ intellectual abilities and dispositions, they do not capture everything philosophers mean by “intellectual virtue.” Intellectual virtue is not just a matter of possessing certain abilities but of using those abilities well: at the right times, for the right reasons, and in the right ways.
Our measures do not tell us whether philosophy majors go on to apply their newfound abilities in the service of truth and justice or, conversely, for personal gain and glory. Settling that question would require gathering a different kind of evidence.
From Studying philosophy does make people better thinkers, according to new research on more than 600,000 college grads
She makes a good point that the reasoning tools of philosophy do help people think more clearly. That is why they are so commonly applied in other, spin-off areas of study. However, I still would not want to study the history of philosophy or otherwise be a philosophy major. IMO, either pursuit would make me less useful in certain ways.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 4, 2025, 10:12 am
Thread Rating:
Philosophy Versus Science
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)