The first cause argument is only there to established an uncaused cause. Then there is other arguments for what the uncaused cause is. I'm not concluding God out of this argument. It doesn't prove he is Loving or All-Good, etc. That's your assumption that I just rely on this argument to conclude everything about God.
The OP was aimed at saying if it was God, then it would mean this and that. I rebutted that argument.
The OP was aimed at saying if it was God, then it would mean this and that. I rebutted that argument.