RE: The idea of God always existing
March 10, 2012 at 12:22 pm
(This post was last modified: March 10, 2012 at 12:26 pm by Werewolff.)
(March 10, 2012 at 11:51 am)Phil Wrote:(March 10, 2012 at 11:43 am)Werewolff Wrote: I don't have time to read the whole thing. Can you summarise?Pretty much a high entropy de Sitter space sitting in a false vacuum (this is why you have to read the paper) gave rise to "bubbles" that were in a true vacuum. Those "bubbles" generally dissipated quickly but at least one found itself stable enough to exist and that was the beginning of the universe {in a low entropy condition) prior to the inflationary period. Now that you are hopelessly confused, make time and read the paper otherwise I can't be bothered to even consider your claims as being serious.
What claims?
Is what is in the paper that you have linked to just a hypothesis or is there evidence? And anyway, what caused it?
(March 10, 2012 at 12:04 pm)Phil Wrote:(March 10, 2012 at 11:59 am)black36 Wrote: Werewolf, you and I think a lot alike.
Phil, with all due respect, you violate your own point here: "The universe doesn't give a flip what any of us care." It "seems like a argument from personal incredulity" to me.
Also, I would love to see how you would explain "de Sitter space" in you own words. Frankly, if one can't explain something which a child could apprehend, then does one really understand the rhetoric one spews? AND, to throw this out: "You don't read much on cosmology and you make that painfully obvious with your heat death already claim." without unpacking it is a bit arrogant, no?
Are you fucking retarded or is your stupidity due to your parents being brother and sister? You apparently saw the word de Sitter space but didn't see the description I gave????? Fuck you.
That was uncalled for.
