Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 27, 2026, 4:55 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked
#1
The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked
Genesis claims that God created Adam then Eve came second. All of our body parts and organs serve a purpose. Except for males, we have nipples. Nipples are meant for women to feed their babies to give them the necessary nutrients to grow up healthy. Men do not have this ability. An intelligent creator that created a man first, would not have given him nipples. I've heard (not sure if it's true though) that all babies are originally female, then as they develop in the womb, they stay female or gain the necessary male hormones. Because of this, men are left with useless nipples. The only way for Christians to dismiss this is to claim God has a nipple fetish.
After I reread what I previously wrote, this idea sounds as crazy as Kurt Cameron's banana theory. Oh well, I'm sticking to it!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked - by ElijahDrew - June 16, 2012 at 9:07 pm
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked - by Justtristo - June 16, 2012 at 9:13 pm
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked - by Godschild - June 16, 2012 at 11:49 pm
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked - by Godschild - June 17, 2012 at 12:54 am
Re: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked - by fr0d0 - June 16, 2012 at 9:31 pm
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked - by Minimalist - June 16, 2012 at 10:01 pm
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked - by Undeceived - June 16, 2012 at 10:36 pm
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked - by Drich - June 17, 2012 at 2:20 am
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked - by Ace Otana - June 17, 2012 at 5:10 am
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked - by fr0d0 - June 17, 2012 at 8:05 am
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked - by Ace Otana - June 17, 2012 at 8:13 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Genesis 1:26 is not implying God is triune GrandizerII 5 2162 August 12, 2025 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 36731 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  There are no answers in Genesis LinuxGal 248 59281 March 24, 2023 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
Rainbow (He/Him/His) No penis, identifies as a male Nihilist Virus 25 5452 April 17, 2021 at 10:37 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis GrandizerII 614 161364 March 9, 2019 at 8:38 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Genesis interpretations - how many are there? Fake Messiah 129 39925 January 22, 2019 at 7:33 pm
Last Post: donlor
  Free interpretation of the Genesis 3:5 KJV theBorg 19 6870 November 13, 2016 at 2:03 am
Last Post: RiddledWithFear
  Genesis - The Prequel! Time Traveler 12 5691 May 17, 2016 at 1:16 am
Last Post: Love333
  Rewriting the bible part 1 - Genesis dyresand 4 2881 March 12, 2016 at 3:14 am
Last Post: robvalue
  god is a moron - genesis dyresand 70 28852 August 7, 2015 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)