RE: Do any 'leading/accomplished' scientists support young earth theory?
June 18, 2012 at 1:34 am
(June 18, 2012 at 12:53 am)GhostofZeus Wrote: Your hostile, petulant, crude and inaccurate insult, communicates to me that you are a very unpleasant person, and anything you write is likely to be of little value.
Oh, please, do go fuck yourself. Being very concerned that you might also consider me hostile, petulant, crude and unpleasant I will allow you to choose your self-fuck weapon of choice.
Let's review, shall we....
In the OP you asked for scientists that give a 'plausible' case for a young earth and that also did not gain their scientific credentials from 'backwater' institutions such as Oral Roberts. Despite your very conditioned question, Popeye immediately eliminates 'plausible' and gives you three names to consider. You then wiki Humphries and reply with a post that can only be concluded as LSU=backwater=Oral Roberts and pile on indicating that you are looking for something from the NSA or Oxford (you didn't like the answer, so you tack on further consideration). Popeye then gives a lengthy, but enjoyable retort regarding the value of work at LSU. You apparently missed the part in the middle where the team at LSU provided a question that the NSA considers one of the top nine questions to be considered.
Still feeling butt-hurt, you continue to reply using four adjectives to describe the insult you perceived. What the fuck exactly is your major malfunction?
