Destroying "atheism", God(The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit) is a Fact

[SavedByChrist94]

Citation please? Which discipline of Science "say" all this?

First Uncaused Cause
Fine Tuning
Morality(Apart of nature, therefore scientific)
Substance Dualism
Intelligent Design
"naturalism" being imposssible
"macro-evolution" being impossible.

Atheism says nothing at all. It is a response to theism and nothing else. I'll leave it to others to educate you on what the Abrahamic bible says about rape.

Bible condemns rape, Deuteromony 22:25-27

25 But if out in the country a man happens to meet a young woman pledged to be married and rapes her, only the man who has done this shall die. 26 Do nothing to the woman; she has committed no sin deserving death. This case is like that of someone who attacks and murders a neighbor, 27 for the man found the young woman out in the country, and though the betrothed woman screamed, there was no one to rescue her.


while under "atheism" there would be no right or wrong, what reason would rape be wrong under "naturalism"/"atheism"?

None.

Added with the fact that "naturalism"'s life support is "macro-evolution" and that rape would help advance the species so under "macro-evolution" and "naturalism"/"natural selection" not only would it not be wrong, not only would it be ok, but it would be good.

Sorry but keep the sinful man(who were sick in the head when they created "atheism"/"naturalism", most likely due to rebellion) made fairy tale myths of "macro-evolution", "naturalism" and "atheism" to yourself, I don't want any of that sick twisted immoral doctrine around me.

---

2, "atheism" says rape is good.

Were you trying to be inflammatory with this, or are you really this misinformed?

Another "atheist" who thinks he knows everything about The Bible because he went on "evil" Bible.com(run a by a pervert who thinks keeps virgins to yourself means something sex, sees the word virgin and thinks sex or rape, probably gets none) or infidels who have been long refuted.

---

Were you trying to be inflammatory with this, or are you really this misinformed?

Also, remind me again which commandment condemns rape?

Deuteromony 22:25-27

25 But if out in the country a man happens to meet a young woman pledged to be married and rapes her, only the man who has done this shall die. 26 Do nothing to the woman; she has committed no sin deserving death. This case is like that of someone who attacks and murders a neighbor, 27 for the man found the young woman out in the country, and though the betrothed woman screamed, there was no one to rescue her.

There are many instances in the bible that condone rape, slavery, incest, murder, genocide and all manner of horrible things.

Nope, none, list some so I could refute you.

---

[quote='SavedByChrist94' pid='379287' dateline='1356887687']
a "lack of belief" needs jusification/proof, I can't lack belief that Person A is the killer without evidence why, especially when we have video footage of Person A committing the murder.

Nope; sorry. In this scenario of yours, you are presented with the evidence that your person A is guilty, not evidence to justify a lack of belief in his guilt. The crime is proven and the perpetrator shown to be the murderer. In other words, you began with the lack of belief and then went on to consider the presented evidence. You just shot yourself in the foot I'm afraid.

Nope, you cannot believe nor Lack belief that the person is a killer, it's what you call neutral, which is not "atheism" but "agnostics", however that is false as something happened, so it would be either Theism(Christian) or "atheism", "atheism"(denial of God's existence or lack of belief in His existence) has no evidence whatsoever and has Substantial evidence against from Theism, that it's an Irrefutable Fact, Theism, Christian Theism that is, is The Facts of life