In which a Fundie gets sexist and Ely gets pissed

[Eilonnwy]

That reminds me, I was listening to one of the Boston Atheists podcasts (well I had downloaded 2, but one was so soft I couldn't understand a thing) where one made a great comment on ripping up posters. Can't remember what it was though.

Yeah for some reason, the one I wasn't on had terrible sound. Proof that the podcast revolves around me.


ANYWAY! Zach was talking about ripping down posters that had to do with "Womans concern" whose agenda was to get vulnerable woman to keep their baby when they are in an unfortunate situation. He finds it morally reprehensible, therefore he removes it and makes a point to tell others why when they ask. He thinks that people who vandalize for the sake of vandalizing are not worth your time. But if someone vandalized an atheist poster because they found it morally reprehensible, then he wants to talk to that person.

P.S. I'm pushing for better audio equipment.

---

I just can't believe someone would say that. It's so blatantly mysogynisitic and shallow.

I mean, did he really think that was a valid response to refute your arguments or support his? Was he just giving up and trying to piss you off?

No idea. He did reply back.

I never said, pretty. I said you are a nice looking lady. The same can not be said for how you innitially came at me with a caustic sense of seething hatred for people who are not atheist. Your attitude is plainly characterized by your words.
If you were more polite, I would not be "describing" your character as being fitting to belong to a bag of worms. You started it. If you don't like how I define what you have presented, be nice.
And I no longer care about proving my point. Colonist are the came here to begin a new way of life. In the 1600's a state, (you still have not told me what I want to know) was founded for the very purpose of being free of religious bias. The Mayflower compact has nothing to do with separation of church and State.
Now, is it not amazing how much more caustic you have grown in your resentment of my description of what you have shown me? In the end, we will all be a bag of worms. It is what we leave to our fellow man that matters. Not ugliness.

Saying your a nice looking lady is the only way I can describe your visual appearance. I could have said, "you are a lady who looks like you are nice". But, you know that is not how we extend verbage when we are trying to say something about character via appearances. You really got that whole idea twisted.
My thought was to say, you look like you could be a nice lady. That would have been the best way to phrase it. I did not think of it til now..However, you should have been able to put that together when I contrasted your character to your false appearances in your picture. If you had some respect for the people who want to come and read your post, instead of belittling them, you would not have had me telling you how deceptive you appear.
I don't like hurting people. For that, I am truly sorry. Your attitude gave me a false sense of what I could write. Usually, people with bad attitudes have more fortitude. You should not be so nasty if you have thin skin.

To which I said:

Your response is completely nonsensical.

First, We were discussing the laws and foundation of the US constitution and you bring up colonies, it's irrelevant!

As for what you said, I was offended because it was sexist. Apparently you feel like people who disagree with you are insulting. You should develop some thicker skin if you can't argue with someone who disagrees with you and bring their gender into it in such an insulting and demeaning way.

I have no interest in speaking with someone who thinks they have a right to make such chauvinistic comments because I don't agree with you and I'm assertive in my arguments. It should never have come up.

Nothing else you said deserves a response, I'm done with this conversation.

He has not posted a response.