(May 11, 2013 at 4:34 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:(May 8, 2013 at 6:56 am)festive1 Wrote: Your purpose of this thread is to assert that the Bible predicts the revelation shown to Mohamed, but you started another thread stating the Bible is a load of hogwash. You can't have it both ways, so which way is it? Does the Bible predict and support Islam? Or is the Bible an untrustworthy book? If the Bible predicts and supports Islam, yet is untrustworthy, how does that support Islam at all? Thus my conclusion that you're shooting your own cause in the foot.No, I can have it both ways
here is how!
Proving that the Bible is false is straight forward, if it has even a single error then it cannot come 100% from God.
If the Bible (or any book) predicts precisely Mohamed or any future event, these predictions cannot be a coincidence it must come from God
for example:
Nostradamus wrote
Century 2, Quatrain #28
"The last son of the man with the prophet's name will bring Diana to her day of rest.
If you accept that this refers to Dodi ElFayed and Diana death, this statement must come from God to predict such event, even if Nostradamus himself was a liar/mistaken in many occasions.
Oh, I see...
I predict that somewhere on this planet, Earth, at sometime today, May 11, 2013, someone named Bob is going to be in a car crash. It won't even make the evening news. See, I'm ordained by god, too!
