(December 2, 2008 at 11:57 am)leo-rcc Wrote: I've seen the interview with O'Reilly and as usual O'Reilly is more interested in hearing himself than actually stay on topic. And how do you explain the "Well if it is true for you than why isn't it true for everyone?" rebuttal Dr. Dawkins made to O'Reilly?Yes, And O'Reilly said, "If it's true to me, and makes me feel good, then there is no harm in that." And Dawkins agreed. So, really, what is Dawkins trying to prove? The conclusion I come up with is, Dawkins makes a claim, but he cannot disprove this claim.
So, in reality, Dawkins says there is no evidence to believe in God, but there is no reason to believe his book if there is no evidence behind it? Remember, opinions are not fact.
I think Dawkins is a crazy man himself claiming religious people are delusional. I think he is trying to escape his own demons.