(December 4, 2008 at 1:17 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: How many times have I told you? And I am yet to hear a satisfactory answer. All I've got is mere pathetic contradiction. "No it isn't on me, the burden on proof is on you. You have to disprove God". What kind of an argument is that? As I have said God doesn't need to be disproved! Why? (I give a reason unlike you) Because there's no evidence of or even structure to "God", TO be disproved in the first place. The burden of proof is on the believer. Why can't God be deflated? because he's already deflated. And he always has been. The whole thing IS - and always has been - just an idea with no evidence to support it. God's already deflated. Because there's nothing to deflate. There's Zero evidence of "God" to be deflated in the first place. He's already deflated.First off, I've said it once, and I will say it as many times as it needs repeating.
The only way anyone can use the, "Lack of Evidence" arguement is unless every option has been explored and examined.
And you know it, and so do I, That is an impossible task to complete.
The lack of evidence arguement has been declined until someone can prove God does not exist in the entire Universe, or beyond. Until the day scientists can say, "Ok, here's the entire Universe, Look, No God." Then you have an arguement.
You made the statement, not me.
All I'm asking is for you to prove your lack of evidence theory.
I'm assuming you have obtained complete knowledge and information about the entire Universe and Beyond?