(December 4, 2008 at 1:46 pm)Psalm 23 Wrote: First off, I've said it once, and I will say it as many times as it needs repeating.As i have said. Thats not how evidence works. You aren't expected to know everything. If I DID know everything I would claim that I KNOW that God doesn't exist but I don't. I merely say that so far there is no evidence and I believe he almost certainly doesn't exist. And that he isn't disproved absolutely but he is (by default, because there's no evidence of anything to disprove) de facto scientifically because there is ZERO evidence of him.
The only way anyone can use the, "Lack of Evidence" arguement is unless every option has been explored and examined.
And you know it, and so do I, That is an impossible task to complete.
The lack of evidence arguement has been declined until someone can prove God does not exist in the entire Universe, or beyond. Until the day scientists can say, "Ok, here's the entire Universe, Look, No God." Then you have an arguement.
You made the statement, not me.
All I'm asking is for you to prove your lack of evidence theory.
I'm assuming you have obtained complete knowledge and information about the entire Universe and Beyond?
You appear to misunderstand how evidence works. And you misunderstand the burden of proof. The whole point is that the burden of proof is on you. Not that "I know there is no God because I have tested everything including the intangible" !! I never said any such thing.
You misunderstand how evidence works and you misunderstand the burden of proof.
And finally. No I did not make the statement. I claimed nothing. And there's nothing to claim. I merely said "No evidence. You are the one making the claims so the burden of proof is on you not me. Its on the believer not the unbeliever".