RE: Dad links son's suicide to 'The God Delusion'
December 4, 2008 at 3:31 pm
(This post was last modified: December 4, 2008 at 3:37 pm by Psalm 23.)
(December 4, 2008 at 3:07 pm)Ace Wrote: You still don't get it!I agree, I would compare your "lack of evidence" arguement to a 5 year old, too.
Bloody hell! Sorry but my 5 year old cousin could understand what I said.
Quote:Ok, this is my last attempt.Thank goodness! Because I will repeat myself as much as it takes. This can go on and on....
Quote:Your claim is nothing but a hypothesis, why? Because nothing supports it. If you had evidence, I could challenge it by finding new evidence. Now I cannot dis-prove a negative. I had simply said, that you lack evidence and evidence means detectable material. Something that can be studied!Maybe you are confusing yourself, and you are thinking too deeply into this? The Bible states very clearly, "No man shall see God and live." When are going to realize, God is a supernatural force that cannot be seen by mankind? If you are waiting for this evidence.. then you may be waiting until you leave this earth.. and then what? What if you were wrong?
Detectable materials. Exactly!! Stop and think!!! This is where you are confusing fantasy with reality. Do you believe God can be detected by man? When the Bible clearly says, "God cannot be (seen) detected?"
Quote:So, by you failing on proving gods existence, and have no knowledge about the meaning of the word "evidence", this debate cannot continue.That's right, this debate is terminated until you can take provide "lack of evidence" as a solid arguement. lack of evidence cannot be declared when such a small amount of the universe can be explored. You are not thinking clearly on this subject. You are stuck in a rut, my friend..
Quote:I ask for evidence. You have brought none and so I dismiss your claim.That's fine, but I also dismiss your claim. So, who wins?
Quote:So stop evading and bring the evidence, because so far, I've seen none.See above ^^
Quote:A hypothesis like yours that has no evidence means it lacks evidence. Nothing supports it. If there was evidence, your god belief would be a theory instead of a hypothesis.Keep searching..
Quote:Your claim lacks evidence. I'm not saying it dis-proves it or proves it. Just plain and simple LACK of EVIDENCE.lack of evidence to only the small amount of the universe that is testable. What is beyond That cannot be explored?
Quote:You have nothing to support your claims. Nothing in this world, space or time that we have found supports your claims. So your claims lacks evidence.You are repeating yourself.. No evidence, No evidence!!! lol. Keep investigating the scene. ((God cannot be seen by man))
Quote:Now, please try and understand that. Because this is becoming ridiculous really. Since you should know how evidence works.Yes, I know how "lack of evidence" works. And you sure have a corrupt way of expressing your definition. I watch F.B.I documentaries, and I know when they claim "Lack of evidence" and when they do not.
And as of right now, you have only investigated a miniscule portion.
(December 4, 2008 at 3:27 pm)CoxRox Wrote: The other so called contradictions: the lights appearingNow stop and think, what light appeared before the Sun was created?