(December 4, 2008 at 4:32 pm)LukeMC Wrote:(December 4, 2008 at 4:29 pm)Ace Wrote:Quote:"God cannot be (seen) detected"
Then I can never believe in him.
If god cannot be detected in anyway, then I can never believe in his existence.
There is no such thing as a god, prove me wrong.
Do you realise that Psalms is just gonna say
"God exists. Prove ME wrong"
And we're back to square one?
Theists have the weaker argument. I thought I should just step in with reason once more.
I could have a comeback like "the flying spaghetti monster exists, prove me wrong
"The fact is, you cannot dis-prove a negative and god is a negative. FSM is a negative and is also something that cannot be dis-proven. In the end, the atheist wins, because the one who claimed, always fails to provide evidence. Thus, no reason to believe.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
