(December 6, 2008 at 12:53 pm)Daystar Wrote: You mean Paleontology not palaeontology, don’t you?
N, I meant "palaeontology" ... it's an English word meaning the study of prehistoric life. In there, BTW, you'll find the point you evidently missed i.e. it's an ENGLISH word, not American, ENGLISH and I am English, get it?
(December 6, 2008 at 12:53 pm)Daystar Wrote: I do not deny that my ignorance of science is comparable to the ignorance of the Bible all of the atheists here except for Chat Pilot possess, all I require of you is one photograph showing one example of a demonstration of evolution. The evidence.
OK ... firstly the majority of atheists here are not as ignorant as you would like to believe they are, they simply disagree with your warped interpretation of it's contents. That is not ignorance, it is a difference of opinion.
Secondly, a photo? Are you serious? Again you betray your ignorance of the theory of evolution ... do you really think mammalian evolution is claimed to have happened across a time as short as 200 years (a generous estimate of the time the camera has been with us)? Would an article written by a relevant scientist convince you? I rather think it wouldn't because you have already decided what is true and no matter what evidence you are shown, reasonable evidence that has persuaded reasonable people that evolution does in fact explain the diversity of life we see around us today, you will not accept it has any merit. That's your loss but I am asking you here and now exactly what evidence it is you require (and no, I cannot supply a photography graphically showing one animal evolving into another which what your ignorance appears to demand)?
Kyu
