(December 6, 2008 at 2:38 pm)Psalm 23 Wrote:(December 6, 2008 at 2:32 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Because the evidence is actually materially there in actual reality. Where's the evidence of God on the other hand?All I'm trying to say is, if evolutionists have gathered all of this brilliant information about evolution and they have stacks of evidence to support it, then why do so many people reject it as a lie? Religious reasons?
Loads of people believe in God but no actual evidence.
53% of Americans apparently reject evolution as you say, but there is actual evidence of evolution. Actual evidence is more important than just what anybody thinks. Some of the greatest scientific theories started with 1 person for instance didn't they? So are you saying that their theories should have been considered completely disproved, and stayed that way from the outset, since they were in such a tiny tiny tiny minority (1 person out of several billion)?
I'd say denial.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.