Virgin Mary, Ark of the Covenant

[Phatt Matt s]

However, Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed, and most biblical scholars and classical historians see the theories of his non-existence as effectively refuted.

Prove it. List the polls.
I don't have to prove anything. YOU are claiming a figment existed. YOU have to prove he did.

No I don't have to prove anything.

So, how do you know this was a hoax:
THe prediction at Fatima Portugal came true:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_the_Sun

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_F%C3%A1tima

THe testimonies of the 70,000 witnesses and the fulfilled predictions isn't something I can say with certainty is bullshit, especially when a lot of the articles were written by people of no Religious persuasion, or Communists and freemasons who were hostile toward Religion.

---

In regard to your statement about me doing anything to prove the existance of Jesus you are right I can't prove my point neither can you prove yours.

The fundamental difference is that if one cannot prove the existence of leprechauns, it is not rational to believe that they exist anyway. It is best to assume that leprechauns do not exist until such evidence is discovered that they do exist, which is highly unlikely would you not agree?

Historians wrote about Christ, and not as a fictional charactar. The same is not true of Lebrechauns.