Virgin Mary, Ark of the Covenant

[Aractus]

3. The translation (while demonstrably true, and accepted by ALL mainstream scholars, and you STILL have provided NOT ONE scholarly reference or rebuttal), is NOT the crux of the so-called "prophecy".

Wrong, I did. I said OT scholars of most Bible translations, like say these ones. You keep claiming every scholar disagrees with Matthew's translation, but if this is the case then why do [i]most[/m] English Bibles have "virgin" in Is. 7:14? It is you who cannot back up your assertions of "every scholar this", "every scholar that".

You've also dodged every question put to you and refused to answer them. It's closed-minded people like you that used to claim that Christians put the world almah in Is 7:14 as it appears in the MT in the first place.

You're also the idiot that keeps wanting to talk about OT matters in a thread on the NT. I gave you a challenge and you failed to meet it, all you've done is try to deflect away from the texts you were told to look at as much as possible.