Four arguments against the existence of God

[Neo-Scholastic]

Fascinating how easy it is to dismiss something you do not understand.

And yet, it is not nearly as fascinating as imagining yourself married in wholehearted commitment to that same something you can only pretend to dimly understand.

I guess turnabout is fair play. But it is a fact that many opponents of the "unmoved mover" think that it is only about efficient cause, as opposed to that One universal principle that does not change despite the changes within and among the plurality of things. This, as opposed to the case of Esquilax that its utility depends on finding some thing among other things, like the Great Pumpkin. Instead what it does do which is confirm the One. From that starting point, one can proceed.