Four arguments against the existence of God

[Esquilax]

I guess turnabout is fair play. But it is a fact that many opponents of the "unmoved mover" think that it is only about efficient cause, as opposed to that One universal principle that does not change despite the changes within and among the plurality of things. This, as opposed to the case of Esquilax that its utility depends on finding some thing among other things, like the Great Pumpkin. Instead what it does do which is confirm the One. From that starting point, one can proceed.

If you don't think that the unmoved mover argument alone is confirmation of the christian god, I'm curious as to why you held it up as positive evidence of god's existence in the first place, and then stopped there.