(December 12, 2014 at 12:37 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Also feel free to go ahead and debunk everything I posted, it's called a discussion.....
You're mixing facts with fiction to suit your needs. Some of your links are valid, some aren't. Like the bible thumper one. This for example is absolute unfounded horseshit only existing outside of any scientific approach.
Quote: I believe that it does, and that these peoples can trace their descent from the Biblical lost tribes of the House of Israel, removed out of their land in Assyrian captivity two thousand seven hundred years ago, and lost to recorded history. The Caucasian peoples, including the Norse, migrated out of Asia into Europe in the early pre-Christian centuries, and have fulfilled many of the prophecies in both the Old and New Testaments concerning Israel in the latter days. Let's begin our study in the foremost prophetic book of the New Testament, Revelation.
Then we have the migration thingy. You do understand the difference between hypothesis and theory? This is still a hypothesis. Not shared by the whole science community and much debated, even within the group[/quote] putting their money on it. This is from your link.
Quote: While we see substantial genetic and archaeological evidence for an Indo-European migration originating in the southern Russian steppes, there is little evidence for a similarly massive Indo-European migration from the Middle East to Europe. One possibility is that, as a much earlier migration (8,000 years old, as opposed to 4,000), the genetic signals carried by Indo-European-speaking farmers may simply have dispersed over the years. There is clearly some genetic evidence for migration from the Middle East, as Cavalli-Sforza and his colleagues showed, but the signal is not strong enough for us to trace the distribution of Neolithic languages throughout the entirety of Indo-European-speaking Europe.
Bold by me: Signal isn't strong enough to make it into a theory.
Last but not least, even if this migration has happened, they didn't move into a void. There already have been people there as archeological discoveries show. One of them the statue I posted, which is by all accounts and researches between 22.000 and 28.000 years old. So they were no savages either and already had their cults. There is no single point of origin for religions as every serious scholar will tell you.