RE: Questioning Beliefs
August 6, 2010 at 2:14 am
(This post was last modified: August 6, 2010 at 3:03 am by tackattack.)
GC - Min is talking about Numbers 15:32-56
Religion is designed to have a better understanding of God/gods , whatever they may be. It has been used historically by people in power to quell the masses and as an excuse to destroy contradictory positions. Hopefully the world has developed enough socially now to better deal with such inequity better. Modern religions (by my observations) have learned that fear/reward as a motivator is outdated and irrelevant to teh topic at hand for religion. People keep people ignorant. People use fear and doggy treats to obfuscate and manipulate the masses. It's been done in a lot more facets of society than religion (buisness, politics, media etc) I personally feeel it's a bit consipratorial to foster ideas of religion being designed to control the masses. If that's true a case could be made that all ideas are meant to controll the masses. Belief is meant to inform and seek truth and defining that belief is what religion does for some. All that aside, I wholeheartily agree that religion has become morally defunct and dogmatically obsolete in a lot of places and would love to see less religion and more conversations about God.
[/end soapbox]
(August 5, 2010 at 7:08 pm)annatar Wrote:Nothing you said is indicative of your assumption that religions can't be questioned by believers. I'm a Christian in a non-denominational Church. Of the 5 or 6 churches I've been to in the Church of God movement all of them teach to question dogma and doctrine. Several other Christian churches outside the COG movement (some protestant, pentacostal, baptist etc.) I've been to have also taught such things but only in a less consistent matter. There it's usually pastoral preference whether to question their doctrine. Since the Church of God movement is a movement focused away from Doctrine it's one of the key principles usually taught in the classrooms. Secondly, introspection is in no way objectifiable because of it's solely subjective nature. However, limiting your biases by not making broad and sweeping judgements on a religion would be a good way to start to "question your beliefs objectively".
(August 5, 2010 at 8:29 pm)DiRNiS Wrote:
Religion is designed to have a better understanding of God/gods , whatever they may be. It has been used historically by people in power to quell the masses and as an excuse to destroy contradictory positions. Hopefully the world has developed enough socially now to better deal with such inequity better. Modern religions (by my observations) have learned that fear/reward as a motivator is outdated and irrelevant to teh topic at hand for religion. People keep people ignorant. People use fear and doggy treats to obfuscate and manipulate the masses. It's been done in a lot more facets of society than religion (buisness, politics, media etc) I personally feeel it's a bit consipratorial to foster ideas of religion being designed to control the masses. If that's true a case could be made that all ideas are meant to controll the masses. Belief is meant to inform and seek truth and defining that belief is what religion does for some. All that aside, I wholeheartily agree that religion has become morally defunct and dogmatically obsolete in a lot of places and would love to see less religion and more conversations about God.
[/end soapbox]
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari