(February 4, 2015 at 4:31 pm)Heywood Wrote: Regarding your second point, this is an issue the court is going to have to decide. My understanding is that some restructuring was done and the actual discriminatory employment postings were for AnswersInGenesis(which is a non profit ministry) jobs....not Ark Encounter jobs.
Actually, it's the exact opposite: the jobs were originally, and unambiguously listed as, for the Ark Encounter. The restructuring that occurred happened after it was pointed out- in a legal context, as Ham didn't care when it was pointed out just casually- that discrimination in that context is illegal, and it literally amounts to nothing more than claiming that the job is for AiG, while still being listed as for the Ark Encounter, and in content being work for the Ark Encounter.
Effectively, they're hiring "for" AiG, and then putting those they hire to work on the Ark Encounter. It's the intentional deception of the government I talked about earlier.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
