First of all, the legal document asserts that AiG's rights have been compromised, but I don't recall anybody ever having the right to large state funded tax breaks, and none of their actual rights are being infringed in any way.
Secondly, it asserts later on that the technician job they were discriminating over was an AiG position, and this is a lie: the job ad initially clearly said it was for the Ark Encounter. Moreover, hiring through one company to do work for another is exactly the kind of shady skirting of the law that got AiG denied in the first place; admitting to it doesn't make it better, especially in such a context where the shady stuff only started happening to cover for the blatantly illegal stuff that they are now claiming they always thought was totally legal.
Also, what is this constant refrain that their first amendment rights to free speech are being impinged upon? How exactly are they being prevented from speaking by not getting a tax break?
Secondly, it asserts later on that the technician job they were discriminating over was an AiG position, and this is a lie: the job ad initially clearly said it was for the Ark Encounter. Moreover, hiring through one company to do work for another is exactly the kind of shady skirting of the law that got AiG denied in the first place; admitting to it doesn't make it better, especially in such a context where the shady stuff only started happening to cover for the blatantly illegal stuff that they are now claiming they always thought was totally legal.
Also, what is this constant refrain that their first amendment rights to free speech are being impinged upon? How exactly are they being prevented from speaking by not getting a tax break?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
