@ Dotard: Like I said originally: try to look at the evidence properly yourself without taking the biased misinformation as gospel (!). You will find that the truth is very different to what you're claiming. I stand here having never been defeated on this on this forum yet. No one has ever found one scrap of evidence to support those claims. I'd urge people to take the rational stance rather than an intellectually unsupportable one as you're doing here: that there is no successfully established challenge against what I'm saying, but there are challenges none the less which should always be taken seriously.
@ Paladin: Yes your argument is with fundamentalist literalists my friend, and not me. My arguments easily defeat yours. You cannot argue the case, just present an endless supply of additional suggestions that are too easily shot down.
@ Paladin: Yes your argument is with fundamentalist literalists my friend, and not me. My arguments easily defeat yours. You cannot argue the case, just present an endless supply of additional suggestions that are too easily shot down.
