RE: A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?
February 26, 2022 at 6:27 pm
(This post was last modified: February 26, 2022 at 6:31 pm by R00tKiT.)
(February 26, 2022 at 6:23 pm)Angrboda Wrote: Revelation and sensus divinitatus aren't arguments; they're direct experience.
Muslims use Muhammad's religious experience in arguments to justify their belief that Islam is true. Same with Christians, Mormons, etc. There is a plethora of arguments based on revelation out there...
(February 26, 2022 at 6:26 pm)Angrboda Wrote:(February 26, 2022 at 6:23 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Neither Kant nor Hume agree with you. I guess I should be proud of how stupid I am.
You're full of shit. I can quote you where Hume shits all over the teleological argument.
The quote in the thread is from Hume's Dialogues. Some interpretations of Hume's work say that he was a deist. His criticism of the argument from design is well known, OFC.
Kant also mentioned the teleological argument with respect, even if he ultimately rejected it. Your gratuitous slurs, however, clearly show that you don't know what you're babbling about.
