RE: A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?
February 26, 2022 at 6:44 pm
(February 26, 2022 at 6:36 pm)Klorophyll Wrote:(February 26, 2022 at 6:36 pm)Angrboda Wrote: As noted, Kant's testimony is rather moot, but where did he say that?
http://www.epistemology.pe.kr/kant/Criti.../ideal.htm
Ctrl+F and type "with respect"
Skip on down a bit brother....
Quote:I therefore maintain that the physico-theological proof can never by itself establish the existence of a supreme being, but must always fall back upon the ontological argument to make good its deficiency.