A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?

[R00tKiT]

But not as obsessed as you are with making them. Others were already pointing out how you were Quote mining Hume (logical fallacy), and yet you still confidently persist in doing it no matter how many people try to correct you - so you see how you fit the formula.

Now you're either being dishonest or didn't read the whole thread. I said repeatedly that Hume rejects the design argument, the quote is ONLY intended to be a presentation of this argument, not a defense of it. This is not quote mining, because I am not relying on the quote in my argument, which you didn't addess at all.

Hey don't worry about the rape kid - got a lollipop for you and a torture party for him.  Punch and pie in the sky!  This, right here, is why no one can turn their back on a person like you.  Disgusting.

You're belittling the afterlife only because you don't believe in it. If you think about it seriously, you would know it's enough to redress all kinds of injustice.

---

Just to be clear, are you saying we shouldn’t  punish rapists in the here-and-now because God will handle their punishment in the afterlife?

Be aware that I’m giving you the chance to explain yourself. It’s kind of important.

Boru

@BrianSoddingBoru4 Of course not. Where did I say that?