RE: A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?
March 12, 2022 at 10:35 am
(This post was last modified: March 12, 2022 at 10:38 am by Deesse23.)
(March 11, 2022 at 6:12 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: imagine a rapist getting 30 years of inhuman torture for his crime, I bet you will start to pity him despite his wrongdoing (after he got 30 years of relentless suffering) and think this is justice enough.. now imagine him getting 300 years like that, or 3000, ... Seriously, eternity is enough.Infinte punishment for finite crimes.
Disgusting.
(March 11, 2022 at 6:12 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: And anyone arguing otherwise doesn't really understand what eternity means....says a guy with a moral compass skewed beyond recognition.
(March 12, 2022 at 8:40 am)Klorophyll Wrote:You are now either advocating infinite punishment for finite crimes plus finite punishment, or you are backpedaling.Quote:Just to be clear, are you saying we shouldn’t punish rapists in the here-and-now because God will handle their punishment in the afterlife?
Be aware that I’m giving you the chance to explain yourself. It’s kind of important.
Boru
@BrianSoddingBoru4 Of course not. Where did I say that?
My bet is on #2
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse