RE: A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?
March 18, 2022 at 4:35 pm
(March 18, 2022 at 3:58 pm)Deesse23 Wrote: Thank you for admitting that you are a moral thug, that your moral compass is skewed and that you have no idea of ethics.
See it wasnt that hard. Just stop evading, stop the dishonesty and the unfair personal attacks at the questioner.
I have seen people worse than an willfully ignorant and unethical barbarian like you on these boards. I have seen people like you, but unwilling to admit what shitty people they are.
tl;dr
You are admittedly a terrible human being, but there still are worse ones around.
What's barbarian about condemning a mass murderer or a serial killer to eternal torment ?
Hitler is responsible for the death of tens of millions of people, @Deesse23. Tell me what kind of finite punishment do you think is just?
Let's do some math:
The value of one human life = infinity.
A murderer who takes away one human life can only get an infinitely long punishment to redress the injustice, any finite duration of emprisonment is inferior to infinity and therefore can't compensate the loss of one life.
There is only one way for you to defend your doomed morality: assign a finite value to human life, in which case you will be the moral thug here.
