Bible contradictions?

[The Grand Nudger]

All species are transitional species

You mean static from your brief vantage point GC? Good thing it has billions of years to work with eh? Speaking of that algae, The reason that I suggested that Chip familiarize himself with the University of Arizona's collection, is that they represent on of the largest groups of demonstrated (and still living) transitional forms available to us (and all in a very simple form of life). Looks like you should do the same.

[Minimalist]

As usual, G-C, you simply do not know what the fuck you are talking about. At least you are consistent.

http://transitionalfossils.com/


The problem is that you simply fall for the creatard bullshit of looking for a crocoduck and thus insist that evolution must conform to your absurd ( and fucking childish) strawman arguments.

Put down your bible and learn something before you go through your entire life as a total fool.

[Phil]

life is static as far as we know.

Maybe as far as you know but you know about as much as the hangnail I just cut off. How the fuck is life static when we take energy in? That means life is dynamic you christoholic idiot.

---

All species are transitional species

You mean static from your brief vantage point GC? Good thing it has billions of years to work with eh? Speaking of that algae, The reason that I suggested that Chip familiarize himself with the University of Arizona's collection, is that they represent on of the largest groups of demonstrated (and still living) transitional forms available to us (and all in a very simple form of life). Looks like you should do the same.

Guess the creotards can't comprehend that they themselves are a transitional form between their parents and their children.

Line up 1000 generations of parent to child. Not much difference from parent to child but the difference between the first parent and the last child is fucking huge. But there was only static and not dynamic life between the first and last right GC?

[KichigaiNeko]

Don't stress it Phil.... they have given their minds over to mindlessness...they are no better than organic robots.

[Phil]

Don't stress it Phil.... they have given their minds over to mindlessness...they are no better than organic robots.

They could believe whatever their black and putrid hearts desire. They will not claim that their shitheaded beliefs have any science backing them and if they think science is on their side I will tell them they are fucking assholes and then show them they don't even know science.

[KichigaiNeko]

I hear what is upsetting you Phil and if it were me??... I would rant and then understand that these imbeciles are not worthy of my energy to reply to them. Kudos that you have been so patient so far... but really .... they are not worth the angst. They are blind and are happy to be so...who are we to "enlighten" them?? They are no more than parasites of the scientific minds and engineers of this age...basically bomb fodder imho....


And Yes... I am in a VERY bad Mood!

[DeistPaladin]

Only changes within a species, no changes from one species to another have ever shown up in the fossil records.

One word: dogs.

Dogs, GC.

Dogs are a separate species from wolves.

Dogs were bred from wolves.

Dogs are an example of how one species can come from another.

And this is within relatively recent human history. That they can be bred through artificial means it can happen in nature.

The fossil records show only fully developed species, no transitional ones,

What do you imagine a "transitional species" would look like? How would a "transitional species" be different from a "species"? What is to stop a Creationist from playing infinite regression, where you'll keep demanding to see transitions between transitions? Say, if we find a transition between Homo Erectus and Neanderthal, would you then ask for a transition between this transition?

and this is a troubling fact for many evolutionist, even though, they do not give up on evolution.

I'm curious and no Creationist has ever answered this question: do you believe there's a conspiracy then?

This is an elaborate conspiracy. It's been going strong for 100 years now, it's taken over the scientific and academic fields. It's sabotaged the entire process of peer review. It has a strong hold across all national borders all over the world. That's an impressive conspiracy! Why?

What's the motive? Is there a lot of money to be made?

So yes life is static as far as we know.

What about the three examples that every child knows about that I cited?

[Minimalist]

What about the three examples that every child knows about that I cited?

Children are inherently smarter than fundies, D-P.

It takes religion to make them stupid.

[Faith No More]

What's the motive?

The motive, of course, is to disprove their god. Anything that doesn't line up factually with their fairy tales is an attempt to do so.

[The Grand Nudger]

That's what science is all about though isn't it? Scientists walk into the lab every morning and ponder how to best disprove the existence of god over their cup of morning joe..lol.