Posts: 66
Threads: 5
Joined: June 13, 2012
Reputation:
0
The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked
June 16, 2012 at 9:07 pm
Genesis claims that God created Adam then Eve came second. All of our body parts and organs serve a purpose. Except for males, we have nipples. Nipples are meant for women to feed their babies to give them the necessary nutrients to grow up healthy. Men do not have this ability. An intelligent creator that created a man first, would not have given him nipples. I've heard (not sure if it's true though) that all babies are originally female, then as they develop in the womb, they stay female or gain the necessary male hormones. Because of this, men are left with useless nipples. The only way for Christians to dismiss this is to claim God has a nipple fetish.
After I reread what I previously wrote, this idea sounds as crazy as Kurt Cameron's banana theory. Oh well, I'm sticking to it!
Posts: 2968
Threads: 10
Joined: June 2, 2012
Reputation:
44
Re: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked
June 16, 2012 at 9:26 pm
It is possible for males to lactate.
Posts: 69248
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked
June 16, 2012 at 10:01 pm
And the shitballs reply" This sort of argument (‘Why would God have done X?’) is really a cheap rhetorical device rather than a real argument for evolution, "
No. It is a demonstration of how childishly easy it is to make creatards look like fucking morons.
If a LITTLE knowledge is a dangerous thing they are walking proof that NO knowledge is infinitely worse.
Posts: 560
Threads: 0
Joined: January 16, 2012
Reputation:
5
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked
June 16, 2012 at 10:36 pm
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2012 at 10:37 pm by Undeceived.)
Even if you're an evolutionist, the "female first" in womb theory is what you should believe. This is because evolution holds that the sexes split by mutation in the womb (or wherever reproduction was accomplished). Before gender, all organisms were allegedly ancestors of the female. I.E. we both agree that babies are originally female, so this is an outdated argument.
Posts: 8781
Threads: 26
Joined: March 15, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked
June 16, 2012 at 11:49 pm
(June 16, 2012 at 9:20 pm)Adjusted Sanity Wrote: He has a plan for our currently useless nipples. He had to put them there early so we could get used to them first. 
Useless not mine, you must not be married.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Posts: 8781
Threads: 26
Joined: March 15, 2010
Reputation:
29
RE: The Male Nipples : Genesis Debunked
June 17, 2012 at 12:54 am
(June 17, 2012 at 12:45 am)Adjusted Sanity Wrote: (June 16, 2012 at 11:49 pm)Godschild Wrote: Useless not mine, you must not be married.
Not really interested anyway. Too busy trying to make these things shoot lasers.
Good luck with that, careful though they could get you for concealed weapons.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
