A good case against God

[Taqiyya Mockingbird]

That is not my assertion. I have pointed out that you assholes have not provided any evidence to support your assertion of a god-figure.

Again, cite where I said "impossible.". Put up or shut up.

Looking back, I see where I was correcting your misrepresentation of "proof" to "EVIDENCE", but missed your misrepresentation "you cannot provide" -- which is not what I said, either -- when I copy-pasted it. that was an oversight on my part, and here you are for a couple of fucking pages hacking away at your own straw man.

Shove the straw man up your ass.

lol already showed where you made the impossibility claim

What you showed was where you misrepresented what I said.

Spoken like a True Christian™ LULZ

Nice talk, Christian. Well done. You set a fine example.

Looks like you need some more tampons.

U so mad. You're supposed to turn the other cheek for your pastor, little boy.

[qutoe]

The special pleading that dodges the question of where your Gawd-thang came from and what created it. You didn't know? What a fucking retard.

I'm familiar with that particular attack on the KCA. I didn't want to assume that it was what you were referring to; there might have been a new line of attack that I hadn't seen before.

Yeah. Kalaam is self-refuting.

Still whining like a bitch, even when you swear. You are a piece of fucking work.

My sister recommends Kotex super absorbent.

Good of her to lend you hers.

Then you have no fucking argument, asshole. That is the entirety of my claim, fucking moron.


That is not my claim. Shove the wicker man up your ass.

lol already showed where you made the impossibility claim

You showed where you misrepresented my claim.

Oh, the goodie two shoes prissy puss is mad now. So much for your precious christardianity.

Maybe two packs, family size.

Good, you'll need it.

You already admitted my claim. All you are doing now is playing a shell game with a straw man and making a public ass of yourself.


Again -- straw man. You assholes make the positive claim of the existence of your sky fairy. And you asshole xtards have not provided a shred of evidence to support that claim. And you fucking idiot asshole have been waving a straw man at me for a couple of hours. Fucking idiot.

I made no positive claims.

A christard who doesn't assert a god. Isn't that a helluva sin to deny your gawd? I'll have your sister send you kotex in your hell.

You misrepresented my rebuttal and I missed that part of your misrepresentation when I copied it to correct it. Go fuck yourself in the ass;. With a cactus. Wrapped in barbed wire.

lol I already showed where you made the impossibility claim.

Again. You misrepresented it.

...aaaaaaaaaaaand you still haven't supported your impossibility claim.

Or would you care to argue that "you can produce absolutely no evidence at all to prove that it is not" should not be interpreted to mean "you can't produce any evidence at all to prove that it is not"?

Can you? show us what evidence you have. Parade your magnificent sky daddy over to CNN and show it off. Put up or fucking shut up.

---

But you aren't positing the existence of ancient men for which we have plenty of evidence.

You posit the exitence of a god that plays an active role in the universe. A creator god, the big cheese, the head honcho but what do we find nada, zip, zero, nothing the god who wasnt there.

But that makes the evidence claim even less plausible; since there isn't always evidence of the effect that humans, which we know exist, have had on the world, how can you claim that there must certainly be gatherable evidence of God's effect on the world, when His effect could be even more subtle than any particular human's?

I love how you pathological liars operate. Hide that imaginary thing behind whatever obfuscative gibberish you can.

[CliveStaples]

How can you say there is a God that intervenes in this plane of reality if you also say that there is no eivdence whatsoever that he does?
How much sense do you think you are making, on a scale of 1-10?
I'd give you a 3. 2 and 1 are saved for Creationists.

How much of what occurs is detectable by humans? Even on a quantum scale, there's information that we literally cannot know. There are states that we know exist, but that we also know that we can't know.

Do you even know anything about fucking anything? Do you know science? Do you know what a measurement is? Do you even know the fucking algebra needed to know the basics of quantum measurements?

The human knowledge of anything doesn't even amount to a pimple on the universe's ass. And you don't even know that much. Your knowledge is just a pimple on the ass of the pimple. And you're gonna talk about what's possible and impossible in the universe? You're gonna talk about what's observable and what isn't?

[Faith No More]

All right, kiddies, play nice. This thread is getting a litle out of hand.

[CliveStaples]

What you showed was where you misrepresented what I said.

lol "'You can't do X' doesn't mean 'It's impossible for you to do X!'"

You're just embarrassing yourself, now. Just walk away.

U so mad. You're supposed to turn the other cheek for your pastor, little boy.

Must be hard to type while you're fingering your own butthole.

Yeah. Kalaam is self-refuting.

How so?

Good of her to lend you hers.

Well to be honest, it was getting really annoying having your mom's blood on my dick all the time.

You showed where you misrepresented my claim.

lol "'can't' doesn't mean 'can't', it means 'maybe you can!'"

Keep going, it's getting funny again.

Good, you'll need it.

Shit yeah I will, your mom's like a fuckin firehose.

A christard who doesn't assert a god. Isn't that a helluva sin to deny your gawd? I'll have your sister send you kotex in your hell.

I don't deny God. I'm just not asserting His existence in this particular thread. I don't just go around constantly giving arguments that God exists.

Again. You misrepresented it.

Yes, how silly of me to assume "can't" means "can't" and not "maybe sometime you could but right now you can't or maybe you just won't but you maybe could too".

Can you? show us what evidence you have. Parade your magnificent sky daddy over to CNN and show it off. Put up or fucking shut up.

lol

Scumbag atheist: Claims X, insists that theist has to disprove it.

I love how you pathological liars operate. Hide that imaginary thing behind whatever obfuscative gibberish you can.

Obfuscative. That's a good word. I like putting the emphasis on the "fus", obFUScative.

---

All right, kiddies, play nice. This thread is getting a litle out of hand.

Wish I would have seen this earlier...

[Faith No More]

I said to play nice. Comprende?

[Epimethean]

It has become grudge goulash with profanity as a condiment.

[CliveStaples]

I said to play nice. Comprende?

Can I say things like "Blow it out your fucking ass", or "Nice straw man, fuckwit"? That was the response to my first post in this thread. Not to mention being called things like 'x-tard' the whole time.

Not that I mind, I like insult fights. But if you guys are taking it seriously, why does it only get reined in when the theists start dishing back? All in fun, of course...

[Taqiyya Mockingbird]

.....

[The Theist]

I said to play nice. Comprende?

Can I say things like "Blow it out your fucking ass", or "Nice straw man, fuckwit"? That was the response to my first post in this thread. Not to mention being called things like 'x-tard' the whole time.

Not that I mind, I like insult fights. But if you guys are taking it seriously, why does it only get reined in when the theists start dishing back? All in fun, of course...

As much as atheists like to insult theists they hate being insulted by them. Check the members list . . . I bet I get banned before you do.

[Epimethean]

Theists get banned for trolling and preaching-and occasionally for threatening. NOT for profanity.