Posts: 5389
Threads: 52
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
48
RE: Sex vs. Christianity
July 21, 2012 at 7:15 am
(July 21, 2012 at 7:08 am)catfish Wrote: (July 21, 2012 at 7:07 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Where does the bible say there were more?
OK, now we got Zen doubting that he knows what's in the Bible...
In Genesis...
Pathetic attempt at dodging there lad, really, really pathetic.
YOU are the one suggesting that there were more than three people(Adam, Eve and Cain) in the world at the time.
Now prove it or fuck off.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Posts: 2911
Threads: 11
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
16
RE: Sex vs. Christianity
July 21, 2012 at 7:18 am
(This post was last modified: July 21, 2012 at 7:19 am by catfish.)
(July 21, 2012 at 7:14 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: The fact that it doesn't say anywhere in the bible that there were more than three people on the planet with Cain, Abel(deceased) and Adam and Eve is irrelevant?
Unfounded claim, re-read Genesis 1 if you doubt that there weren't more.
(July 21, 2012 at 7:15 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Pathetic attempt at dodging there lad, really, really pathetic.
YOU are the one suggesting that there were more than three people(Adam, Eve and Cain) in the world at the time.
Now prove it or fuck off.
LOL!, you're the one who's so smart, read Genesis 1 there boy...
Posts: 12512
Threads: 202
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
107
RE: Sex vs. Christianity
July 21, 2012 at 7:20 am
(July 21, 2012 at 7:18 am)catfish Wrote: (July 21, 2012 at 7:14 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: The fact that it doesn't say anywhere in the bible that there were more than three people on the planet with Cain, Abel(deceased) and Adam and Eve is irrelevant?
Unfounded claim, re-read Genesis 1 if you doubt that there weren't more.
But it says there weren't and then suddenly we have NOD!! Um WTF?? I would suggest YOU re-read your silly badly written novel
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Posts: 2911
Threads: 11
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
16
RE: Sex vs. Christianity
July 21, 2012 at 7:21 am
If needed, I can give a quick lesson on sentence structure and basic logic.
Posts: 5389
Threads: 52
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
48
RE: Sex vs. Christianity
July 21, 2012 at 7:24 am
(July 21, 2012 at 7:18 am)catfish Wrote: (July 21, 2012 at 7:14 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: The fact that it doesn't say anywhere in the bible that there were more than three people on the planet with Cain, Abel(deceased) and Adam and Eve is irrelevant?
Unfounded claim, re-read Genesis 1 if you doubt that there weren't more.
(July 21, 2012 at 7:15 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Pathetic attempt at dodging there lad, really, really pathetic.
YOU are the one suggesting that there were more than three people(Adam, Eve and Cain) in the world at the time.
Now prove it or fuck off.
LOL!, you're the one who's so smart, read Genesis 1 there boy...
No, YOU made the claim, now quote the relevent passage.
Or I shall consider this discussion closed and you a loser.
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Posts: 2911
Threads: 11
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
16
RE: Sex vs. Christianity
July 21, 2012 at 7:24 am
(July 21, 2012 at 7:20 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: But it says there weren't and then suddenly we have NOD!! Um WTF?? I would suggest YOU re-read your silly badly written novel
Nod is in Genesis 2.
You should just back out quietly...
Posts: 3160
Threads: 56
Joined: February 14, 2012
Reputation:
39
RE: Sex vs. Christianity
July 21, 2012 at 7:25 am
(This post was last modified: July 21, 2012 at 7:25 am by Reforged.)
(July 21, 2012 at 7:21 am)catfish Wrote: If needed, I can give a quick lesson on sentence structure and basic logic. You obviously missed my response or you need a quick lesson in manners:
"Which claim are you referring to?
Even if that were the case, according to you "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence" is irrelevant... right? :-)"
You just said my claims have nothing to them yet it is your Bible backing them. You're also asking me for evidence when apparently you don't value it.
Explain.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
Posts: 6946
Threads: 26
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
83
RE: Sex vs. Christianity
July 21, 2012 at 7:26 am
(July 21, 2012 at 7:00 am)catfish Wrote: (July 21, 2012 at 6:54 am)cato123 Wrote: Am I mistaken or did you exclaim that "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"? Do you really maintain this? Yes or no.
irrelevant...
Describing your original argument as irrelevant is hardly convincing.
Posts: 3160
Threads: 56
Joined: February 14, 2012
Reputation:
39
RE: Sex vs. Christianity
July 21, 2012 at 7:27 am
I'm disappointed really, they usually last longer than this.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
Posts: 2911
Threads: 11
Joined: July 20, 2012
Reputation:
16
RE: Sex vs. Christianity
July 21, 2012 at 7:28 am
(July 21, 2012 at 7:24 am)Zen Badger Wrote: No, YOU made the claim, now quote the relevent passage.
Or I shall consider this discussion closed and you a loser.
You should also just back out quietly, we haven't even gotten past Genesis 1 and you've demonstrated a severe lack of knowledge about the Bible and/or basic language skills.
Genesis 1:26-27
King James Version (KJV)
26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
"them" is the relevant word there. Unless you wish to claim that "them" means one person?
|
