Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 5, 2026, 9:39 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The year of whose lord?
#31
RE: The year of whose lord?
Reply
#32
RE: The year of whose lord?
(July 22, 2012 at 11:18 pm)Shell B Wrote: Was she married to Joseph when she got pregnant with Jesus?

Look the whole thing is made up, but for a man of that society to marry a girl with child would need some explaining. Oh sod this, you have somehow forced me into becoming a christian apologist, I need a drink after falling through that fence.
Reply
#33
RE: The year of whose lord?
I read Drich's copy and paste:


You'd think your almighty, all knowing, perfect god could keep his authors from confusing the shit out of everyone and leave absolutely no room for theories, conjecture and the inevitable (and painfully obvious) contradictions. Undecided

It's the same ole same ole from you and your kind: "This is what god really meant, and all you need to do is trust me that THIS particular interpretation is the one true explanation." "Oh and uh, an extensive knowledge of ancient Hebrew and Greek, a library of ancient manuscripts, a Doctorate in Theology and a healthy dose of 'creative phrasing' is also very helpful in understanding what god REALLY meant."

[Image: Cherna-facepalm.gif]
Reply
#34
RE: The year of whose lord?
(July 23, 2012 at 12:02 am)Cinjin Wrote: I read Drich's copy and paste:


You'd think your almighty, all knowing, perfect god could keep his authors from confusing the shit out of everyone and leave absolutely no room for theories, conjecture and the inevitable (and painfully obvious) contradictions. Undecided

It's the same ole same ole from you and your kind: "This is what god really meant, and all you need to do is trust me that THIS particular interpretation is the one true explanation." "Oh and uh, an extensive knowledge of ancient Hebrew and Greek, a library of ancient manuscripts, a Doctorate in Theology and a healthy dose of 'creative phrasing' is also very helpful in understanding what god REALLY meant."

[Image: Cherna-facepalm.gif]

hot-tub=drichs reasoning

I think some just took a big shit in your pool pal.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die." 
- Abdul Alhazred.
Reply
#35
RE: The year of whose lord?
(July 23, 2012 at 12:02 am)Cinjin Wrote: I read Drich's copy and paste:


You'd think your almighty, all knowing, perfect god could keep his authors from confusing the shit out of everyone and leave absolutely no room for theories, conjecture and the inevitable (and painfully obvious) contradictions. Undecided

It's the same ole same ole from you and your kind: "This is what god really meant, and all you need to do is trust me that THIS particular interpretation is the one true explanation." "Oh and uh, an extensive knowledge of ancient Hebrew and Greek, a library of ancient manuscripts, a Doctorate in Theology and a healthy dose of 'creative phrasing' is also very helpful in understanding what god REALLY meant."

[Image: Cherna-facepalm.gif]

There is no confusion for one willing to do just the tinest bit of research. It took me all of 2 mins to put that post together. The problem lies when one put all of his eggs into the english translation and ignores the fact that everything that is being discussed happened in a different time, culture and language. so yeah there are going to be some areas where things get lost in translation. It seems every other area of the world understands this except english speaking countries. This should be a bit of a wake up call in the the world, more over God does not revolve around you or what you think you understand. We have been commanded to seek God. looking past the english is apart of that 'seeking' process.
Reply
#36
RE: The year of whose lord?
(July 23, 2012 at 12:16 am)Drich Wrote:
(July 23, 2012 at 12:02 am)Cinjin Wrote: I read Drich's copy and paste:


You'd think your almighty, all knowing, perfect god could keep his authors from confusing the shit out of everyone and leave absolutely no room for theories, conjecture and the inevitable (and painfully obvious) contradictions. Undecided

It's the same ole same ole from you and your kind: "This is what god really meant, and all you need to do is trust me that THIS particular interpretation is the one true explanation." "Oh and uh, an extensive knowledge of ancient Hebrew and Greek, a library of ancient manuscripts, a Doctorate in Theology and a healthy dose of 'creative phrasing' is also very helpful in understanding what god REALLY meant."

[Image: Cherna-facepalm.gif]

There is no confusion for one willing to do just the tinest bit of research. It took me all of 2 mins to put that post together. The problem lies when one put all of his eggs into the english translation and ignores the fact that everything that is being discussed happened in a different time, culture and language. so yeah there are going to be some areas where things get lost in translation. It seems every other area of the world understands this except english speaking countries. This should be a bit of a wake up call in the the world, more over God does not revolve around you or what you think you understand. We have been commanded to seek God. looking past the english is apart of that 'seeking' process.

Most of those places you're talking about follow the bible very literally and blindly.

Things are perhaps "lost in translation", but it doesn't change the fact that the bible as we know it to be written is mostly true to the original translation, and the translated texts are what the religion is based on. The whole picking and choosing thing is just how Christians get around the fact that their "infallible" book is heavily flawed so that they can justify it. It doesn't change anything.
You really believe in a man who has helped to save the world twice, with the power to change his physical appearance? An alien who travels though time and space--in a police box?!? [Image: TARDIS.gif]
Reply
#37
RE: The year of whose lord?
(July 23, 2012 at 12:16 am)Drich Wrote:
(July 23, 2012 at 12:02 am)Cinjin Wrote: I read Drich's copy and paste:


You'd think your almighty, all knowing, perfect god could keep his authors from confusing the shit out of everyone and leave absolutely no room for theories, conjecture and the inevitable (and painfully obvious) contradictions. Undecided

It's the same ole same ole from you and your kind: "This is what god really meant, and all you need to do is trust me that THIS particular interpretation is the one true explanation." "Oh and uh, an extensive knowledge of ancient Hebrew and Greek, a library of ancient manuscripts, a Doctorate in Theology and a healthy dose of 'creative phrasing' is also very helpful in understanding what god REALLY meant."

[Image: Cherna-facepalm.gif]

There is no confusion for one willing to do just the tinest bit of research. It took me all of 2 mins to put that post together. The problem lies when one put all of his eggs into the english translation and ignores the fact that everything that is being discussed happened in a different time, culture and language. so yeah there are going to be some areas where things get lost in translation. It seems every other area of the world understands this except english speaking countries. This should be a bit of a wake up call in the the world, more over God does not revolve around you or what you think you understand. We have been commanded to seek God. looking past the english is apart of that 'seeking' process.

That's awesome. YOU have the internet and someone else's research and yet have the audacity to proclaim, "Hey it only took me 2 minutes to do the tiniest bit of research." Screw all those people who don't have the internet and someone else's extensive research. How obtuse can you possibly be??? If you wanted to know what god meant prior to 1993 and you didn't have access to a library of Hebrew and Greek and/or you simply weren't willing to take a fundy researcher's word for granted, you were screwed. Which equals BILLIONS of people. Your god's more impotent and pathetic than fat Elvis.

God: "Hey I want them to seek me ... and I'm going to make it a brutal son of a bitch to do just that."
Reply
#38
RE: The year of whose lord?
(July 23, 2012 at 12:16 am)Drich Wrote: We have been commanded to seek God. looking past the english is apart of that 'seeking' process.

I know just what you mean, always queuing up for something you want arn't they and getting in the way! I have much the same problem when looking at Belgiums, apples come from nowhere.

[Image: magritte_thesonofman.jpg]
Reply
#39
RE: The year of whose lord?
Drich Wrote:more over God does not revolve around you or what you think you understand.

From what I can tell, your god doesn't do shit. I mean seriously, he needs a good bitch slap and get off his lazy ass.
Reply
#40
RE: The year of whose lord?
(July 23, 2012 at 12:28 am)KnockEmOuttt Wrote: Most of those places you're talking about follow the bible very literally and blindly.
..And you know this because you been to "Most of those places" or are you relying on a sterotype?

Quote:Things are perhaps "lost in translation", but it doesn't change the fact that the bible as we know it to be written is mostly true to the original translation, and the translated texts are what the religion is based on. The whole picking and choosing thing is just how Christians get around the fact that their "infallible" book is heavily flawed so that they can justify it. It doesn't change anything.
ahhh, no.

the bible (Or rather most verions of it in the English) are what as known as a literal translation where they take a word in the greek or Hebrew and contextually translate and place it so it read smoothly to english readers. However inorder to do this a great deal is lost to translation. History, Cultural meanings, poetry, and a great majority of it is cast aside to maintain literal continuity, (closest thing to a word for word translation as possiable) rather than interject commentary. That said there are many bibles out there in the english that have commentary. But these are considered to be influenced by which ever brand of Christianity/or other faith has included the commentary.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A prediction for the new year zebo-the-fat 14 4340 December 20, 2018 at 7:29 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Jesus as Lord - why is this appealing to so many? KevinM1 307 96065 February 14, 2018 at 9:07 pm
Last Post: polymath257
  The 100-year anniversay of Fatima is coming-up! Jehanne 21 8677 October 13, 2017 at 12:10 pm
Last Post: JackRussell
  Brazilian woman has spent years praying to Lord of the Rings doll Cyberman 41 12844 January 8, 2017 at 2:27 pm
Last Post: brewer
  9-year old girl hearing voices of the Devil. Jehanne 103 31601 July 19, 2016 at 3:16 pm
Last Post: account_inactive
  Love the Lord your God with all your heart ? Angrboda 144 50497 June 20, 2016 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: KUSA
  "For the lord thy god is a jealous god among you." Socratic Meth Head 52 20378 June 8, 2016 at 10:10 am
Last Post: deleteduser12345
  That magical time of year again... LadyForCamus 38 16600 March 27, 2016 at 6:25 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  Mormon Church Admits Smith Married 14 year old JesusHChrist 15 6752 September 16, 2015 at 3:51 pm
Last Post: Clueless Morgan
  "The Lord has redeemed all of us, all of us..." should we be grateful? Whateverist 325 137589 July 21, 2015 at 3:02 pm
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)