Sacrifices are sick! Contradiction Alert!!!

[Cinjin]

What you consider "bashing" is just me presenting my own interpretation of the "truth" about what is actually written.

This is so perfect. I'm going to save a link to this post so that any time I'm accused of being a "bible-hater" I'll have a Get-out-of-jail-free card given to me by a fundy.
I'm just going to tell them that what you consider bashing is just me presenting my OWN interpretation of the truth. Love it. It's intellectually dishonest while paradoxically being completely honest with what one chooses to believe about the bible. It's perfect in all its self-righteous ridiculousness.

I don't accept any labels that you would attemp to place on me, but you can call me a Christian if you like. Just because I don't adhere to their religious dogma is no reason to label me as a "heathen".

I didn't label you a heathen. I asked you a question and just because you don't accept labels doesn't mean that I can't give you one. For now, you are as you have been, the Unchristian-Christian. Taking either side whenever it suits you and rewriting an entire religion to fit your own personal desires.

I stand on my own two feet, not the "church's", not yours, not anyone's except my own. If you can't deal with that, it would probrably be better for you to skip over my posts.

I can't deal with you standing on your own two feet???? Um what does that even mean?
I dispute many of the things you write because they are absurd and are often meant to push people's buttons. Your acceptance of anyone's religious views is of no interest to me. Stand wherever the hell you want, but don't expect me to silently read you defend the bible tooth n nail in one thread, and then turn around and rip it to shreds in another. We call that a troll around here.

[catfish]

Of course you would supply no rebuttal.

[Cinjin]

Of course you would supply no rebuttal.

Just because the rebuttal is not to your liking does not mean that it is not indeed a rebuttal.

[catfish]

OK, no pertinent, logical rebuttal... That better for ya? Or do you need me to write slowly?

[Cinjin]

OK, no pertinent, logical rebuttal... That better for ya? Or do you need me to write slowly?

Do you really want to start a pissing match with me over what a proper rebuttal is according to you? Is that what you're resorting to? Because I could say the exact same thing right now. Where is your rebuttal? Come on catfish, this is childish 'I'm rubber, you're glue' bull shit.

[catfish]

What exactly have you offered to the discussion here besides whiny fucking rants?

[Cinjin]

To avoid a further pissing match in a public forum, I can explain in detail to you why I'm calling you out in several of your threads by way of a PM if you would like. Fair enough?

[Faith No More]

Then refute what I wrote. (if you can)

I'm sorry, but you seem to be under the impression that you have ever said anything here worth refuting.

[catfish]

To avoid a further pissing match in a public forum, I can explain in detail to you why I'm calling you out in several of your threads by way of a PM if you would like. Fair enough?

If you feel the need, by all means, PM me.

[Cato]

This is the funniest thing I've read in a while.

Then refute what I wrote. (if you can)

Refute what you wrote? Your demand takes a very special kind of stupid. Not only do you require that other Christians (sorry DC and Drich, he seems more in your camp) believe in your ultra-literal view of the bible, but you seem to ignore the 'love thy neighbor' bit. Your limitations, not mine.