Sacrifices are sick! Contradiction Alert!!!

[Faith No More]

There is no need to misrepresent your words. They have spoken for themselves and are there for anyone to see. Repeatedly insisting that I am being dishonest does not make it so.

Anways, clearly you would rather keep the conversation on my character rather than actually defending your words, so I am going to do something less painful and more productive than talking to you, like lighting my face on fire.

[catfish]

have fun!

[Reforged]

have fun!

I'm not even sure why this idiot joined a site where people debate this kind of thing.
He obviously hasn't the intellect to do anything of the sort.

Oh well, hes retreated yet again so I guess that means another victory to Faith No More and Rhythm.
I say victory, it was more like kicking a crippled dog to death while it yelps in protest than an actual debate but still.

'Nough said.

[catfish]

Delusions abound in your world.

Keep telling yourself that bs, it won't make it true no matter how much you wish it were so.

[The Grand Nudger]

No, no, you guys misunderstand Cat.... If I cherrypick, that would be dishonest. However, Cat does so with the (cherrypicked) sanction of holy writ - ergo it is not dishonest.



You know, I can imagine many more reasons that a person might cherrypick their favorite fairy tale Cat -most of which have nothing to do with dishonesty-, why dishonesty seems to have jumped out at you when the subject was brought up is, in my opinion, about ten times more interesting than whatever part of your ghost story you find acceptable.

[Cato]

No, no, you guys misunderstand Cat.... If I cherrypick, that would be dishonest. However, Cat does so with the (cherrypicked) sanction of holy writ - ergo it is not dishonest.



You know, I can imagine many more reasons that a person might cherrypick their favorite fairy tale Cat -most of which have nothing to do with dishonesty-, why dishonesty seems to have jumped out at you when the subject was brought up is, in my opinion, about ten times more interesting than whatever part of your ghost story you find acceptable.

Catfish uses that emoticon. You should upgrade to this instead:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJUn4gwevLg

[Cinjin]

Nope, next time you misrepresent my words, I'll just call you what you are.

While not a "direct" violation of the rules, lying about what someone says/said is dishonest.

Just sayin....

a running theme for catfish around here... *sigh

[catfish]

You guys really think that cherrypicking another poster's words is honest? Really?

Rythym said earlier: "...I could start cherrypicking your responses......and there isn't shit that you could say about it without arguing against yourself. "
To which I replied: "And go ahead and cherrypick my responses, it'll just prove to me your dishonest."
And Faith No More misrepresented what I said when he responded to me: "So, cherrypicking is dishonest?" (leaving out the key words from me, "my responses")

The conversation was about the Bible, which does support cherrypicking. The subject of cherrypicking was NOT about an individual's words or responses.
You guys twisted my words either because you're all stupid or dishonest (an honest mistake should have been accompanied by a correction). I prefer to think someone's stupid as opposed to lying, but it's possible you all are both.
Cherrypicking a poster's words is just plain intellectually dishonest. You can cherrypick from the Bible all you want, but I am here to tell you what I said and defend my own words. So when I say that I did not say something, there ain't shit you can say about it. Dishonesty at it's worse...

So, keep exposing yourselves for what you are, I will continue to be honorable and not lie about what you guys say. (see, that's the difference, I don't have to lie to make you look like fools)

[Jackalope]

Perhaps you didn't hear that whooshing noise as Rhythm's point sailed way over your head.

[catfish]

No, perhaps Rythym's point was as low as it could go.

Do you think that misrepresenting a poster's words is honest?