What one thing would disprove Christianity to you?

[ukiah]

That God dosent exist

[Tea Earl Grey Hot]

You're begging the question. You're assuming "devil" as defined specifically by Christian theology which means you're assuming Christianity in your attempt to defend the resurrection, the resurrection being what proves Christianity.

I can't prove a negative, can I? I can't prove that devils can't rise the dead, thus the onus is on you to provide some evidence that they can.

You're kidding right? I merely threw "devils" out (along with aliens, gods, etc) to prove the point that Jesus resurrecting doesn't entail Christianity is true. I could have said "crab people" or "tinker bell." It doesn't matter to my point.

---

That God dosent exist

Hey Darkstar, looks like we caught one!

[The Grand Nudger]

Yes.. Daniel..the onus to provide evidence would be on those who propose that devils, angels, or gods have the power to raise the dead..................

[Cato]

I can't prove a negative, can I? I can't prove that devils can't rise the dead, thus the onus is on you to provide some evidence that they can.

Excellent! You seem to be getting the proof for claims narrative. Care to share the proof of your god? While you're at it, please share how the creator of the universe could possibly be held accountable for the bullshit in your special book.

[Drich]

Proof of the existence of a god - plus proof it was THAT god -

which looks like what?

IE - the god in person - explaining why he murdered children

Because he knew they would grow up hating and killing Jews. (it says so in most of the texts.) The bible even shows when they let people live that were not supposed to live they spawn nations who rise up and kill and enslave Jews.

---

...

If you saw Christ in this life what could their possiably convince you that you were wrong?

I just want to juxtapose this with this:

Some seem to thing that the theist here are avoiding questions. I can not speak for everyone, but i know I don't unless the question is an attempt to derail the topic or is just beligerantly disrespectful or blasphmous.

Again, I know God exists because I see evidences of it everyday! There is NOTHING that would convince me otherwise. It would be like if I asked you what would it take for you to be convinced that your beloved Patric Stewart did not exist. Even if you never met the man (I have at a con so your good) you still know he exists because you seen the result of his work. Same deal for me with God. I know because I see the results of His work every day.

Clear enough for you or do we default back to you view the world a certain way and because my answer does not reflect your world view YOU believe I am avoiding the question.

---

And I sense that I've toggled over into rambling, so I'll just end this without summary point. For what it's worth.

It is a good thing I started reading all of your last lines first!

"Fool me once shame on you, Fool me twice... shame.. well you better not fool me twice! heh heh...

-G.W. Bush

[The realest]

Devils don't have the power to rise people from the dead.

You would have thought the athiest knew that

[Tea Earl Grey Hot]

WTF? First "The truth." Now we have "The challenger" and this guy "The realest" all labeled "Christian" and sounding stupid.

[The realest]

---

To the Christians on the forum: What one (and only one) thing would if shown to be true, disprove Christianity entirely for you?

That is all.

---

• 
  

  ---

  Honestly, I don't know why us serious Xians should bother answering when threads like this go way off-topic and there's no realistic expectation of a serious discussion on the matter.

  ---

  
  
• 
  

  ---

  With that said, my answer is this. If you could prove to me that Jesus was not crucified, or if you could provide sufficient evidence to prove that his body is not risen, then that would prove I am wrong.

  ---

That's all, I'm not continuing the discussion with anyone who offers stupid replies. You give me a serious reply and I will respond, as usual.

I'm sick of atheist who are unlearned and try to hide it by there stupid replies. Whoever you're talking to please stop the conversation before it's to late. You've stated your facts the atheist didn't.

[Norfolk And Chance]

When you tell people they are "unlearned" can you please use the correct words "their" instead of "there", and "too" instead of "to", oh and "atheists" instead of "atheist" (before who)... hmmm, and perhaps you could use a comma between "facts" and "the".

See there is nothing worse than being accused of being unlearned, or in other words not too bright, by someone who appears to be as thick as mince themselves.

[Angrboda]

And I sense that I've toggled over into rambling, so I'll just end this without summary point. For what it's worth.

It is a good thing I started reading all of your last lines first!

"Fool me once shame on you, Fool me twice... shame.. well you better not fool me twice! heh heh...

-G.W. Bush

It doesn't come as any kind of a shock to me to find that you only read "the good parts version."