Buddhism, against having fun.

[SpecUVdust]

[alwayson]

The point of the link is to show that karma merely means action. So karmamudra translates to action seal

[SpecUVdust]

Your point was dismissed by the definition of karma itself. Again, it IS much more than mere "action." You are avoiding facts, not me.

---

You don't explain karma by defining karmamudra or karma sutra or any other words prefixed with karma. YOU DEFINE FUCKING KARMA? There's a free lesson.

[alwayson]

I already gave you the proper definition of karma, which is action.

At this point, if you don't want to accept it, thats on you.

[SpecUVdust]

I already gave you the proper definition of karma, which is action.

There's more to itBolded by me)


In Buddhism, karma (Pāli kamma) is strictly distinguished from vipāka, meaning "fruit" or "result". Karma is categorized within the group or groups of cause (Pāli hetu) in the chain of cause and effect, where it comprises the elements of "volitional activities" (Pali sankhara) and "action" (Pali bhava). Any action is understood as creating "seeds" in the mind that will sprout into the appropriate result (Pāli vipaka) when met with the right conditions. Most types of karmas, with good or bad results, will keep one within the wheel of samsāra, while others will liberate one to nirvāna. [citation needed]

[CapnAwesome]

I've come across this misunderstanding before. So I'll explain from scratch.

The Gelug school (of the Dalai Lama) is the newest of the 6 schools of Tibetan Buddhism. It was founded by Tsongkhapa.

The Gelug school eventually formed a government over a part of Tibet. Previously other schools formed governments. And now there is no Tibet anymore.

OMG you are right! The pope and Dalai Lama are not exactly identical people. Since my original post said that they were both tolerant, because I had made out with the pope, is it safe to assume that you believe that I had actually made out with the pope? Is it then safe to assume that you are also an idiot?

[alwayson]

This is what you said, and which I replied to:

They are both leaders of the sect of a world wide religion?

[Something completely different]

SpekUVdust.

kudos, I am amazed how you find the patience to converse with a person who constantly rehashes the same shit whilest desperatly trying to ignore the question and get to a knew point with which he`s more comfortable with.

[SpecUVdust]

Eh, it's cold outside and it's the weekend so I haven't much anything better to do lol. But thanks

[alwayson]

I already gave you the proper definition of karma, which is action.

There's more to itBolded by me)


In Buddhism, karma (Pāli kamma) is strictly distinguished from vipāka, meaning "fruit" or "result". Karma is categorized within the group or groups of cause (Pāli hetu) in the chain of cause and effect, where it comprises the elements of "volitional activities" (Pali sankhara) and "action" (Pali bhava). Any action is understood as creating "seeds" in the mind that will sprout into the appropriate result (Pāli vipaka) when met with the right conditions. Most types of karmas, with good or bad results, will keep one within the wheel of samsāra, while others will liberate one to nirvāna. [citation needed]

I don't go by Wikipedia, let alone unreferenced material, let alone material someone thought dubious enough to tag with citation needed.