Do you think "necrophilia" can be considered a legit sexual orientation?

[Tea Earl Grey Hot]

I think it's funny how often atheists on this forum will just assert moral values like if they're obvious.

Wait...this all seems so familiar....

Since it is the law, it is you who is in need why the things you think should be debated over have the possibility of being legal.
So please give your arguments for the legality of:

Childrape.

Child genital mutilation

Corpse fucking

This is the sort of response I'm talking about. It doesn't deal with any of the more fundamental issues raised by the op and just asserts the very thi...

Wait, why does it seem like this has all happened before? I think I'm stuck in a time loop...

[Whateverist]

So long as you give your corpse a safety word, you can assume you have consent if you don't hear it spoken. What goes on in the grave, stays in the grave.

[NoraBrimstone]

Wow, you're a strange one, aren't you? LOL

Anywhooo... Necrophelia is a victimless crime, so I'm all against it being illegal. However, I don't think it can really be considered a "legit sexual orientation" because I don't think it is particularly healthy (mentally) for a person to be sexually attracted to a corpse. If there was research done that proved otherwise, then I would probably change this view.

As for paedophilia, I agree that there is a huge difference between someone who is attracted to children and someone who molests children.

You also need to learn the difference between paedophilia and hebephilia.

[Something completely different]

This is the sort of response I'm talking about. It doesn't deal with any of the more fundamental issues raised by the op and just asserts the very thi...

Wait, why does it seem like this has all happened before? I think I'm stuck in a time loop...

Because you constantly keep asserting that one has to debate the fundermental laws of a state, or that the high courts or some other legal representative ows you an explaination for why certain things are illegal.

They dont.

And frankly most people feel comfortable in a sociaty in which childrape, corpsefucking and the genital mutilation of a child (and yes you wanted to debate the "legal possiblity" of two of these subjects) are illegal.

If you personaly think that these things should be legal then you should deliver your arguments for that.

Otherwise I simply think that you are trying to get attention through being outrageous.

[Violet]

Since it is the law, it is you who is in need why the things you think should be debated over have the possibility of being legal.
So please give your arguments for the legality of:

Childrape.

Conditioning, effective for either purposes of control or for sowing disorder, powerful stage-set for future investment (particularly: dynasties, puppeteering, leverage in general), brutal sexual education, etc.

What constitutes child rape in this case? Are we considering consensual child sex akin to child rape; are we considering two similarly aged children having sex akin to child rape; are we using a less ridiculous definition of child rape which involves absence of consent in (at least) one party?

Child genital mutilation

Reduced chance for HIV contraction, sometimes effective towards establishing dominance hierarchy if done at age where individual can remember the occurrence, some believe that surgically modified genitals look 'better', traditional in many cultures (for either sex), typically seen as a plus in the parent's eyes if/when it is performed, at early ages the individual will (typically) be very mildly affected by the loss.

Someone please remind me to never turn evil?

Corpse fucking

Dildos, vibrators, whips, chains, ropes, and any other non-person object used towards sexual gratification. That it's against any laws is simply hilarious

---

Because you constantly keep asserting that one has to debate the fundermental laws of a state, or that the high courts or some other legal representative ows you an explaination for why certain things are illegal.

They dont.

Ahhh, then they shouldn't feel remotely confused when they are assassinated Will keep in mind, 'tell next victim what they do not owe me an explanation prior to their death'.

And frankly most people feel comfortable in a sociaty in which childrape, corpsefucking and the genital mutilation of a child (and yes you wanted to debate the "legal possiblity" of two of these subjects) are illegal.

Most people would feel comfortable in a society where fucking a corpse is legal (few would engage in the behavior in the first place). Many people are apparently comfortable in societies where genital mutilation of children is legal.

I don't see where child particularly rape differs from any other sort of rape, but I also do not believe the legality or illegality of it affects the wide majority of people who would like to rape a child. My question: how could this be legalized to account for the increased number of murders, child protection lawsuits, and ownership over children in the result of pregnancies? To make it legal, you'd first have to unravel that ball of wax, otherwise it would be both legal and not legal at once (raping the child is legal, abusing the child... isn't?).

If you personaly think that these things should be legal then you should deliver your arguments for that.

Otherwise I simply think that you are trying to get attention through being outrageous.

Who doesn't think that corpse-fucking should be legal?

I've been told before that it's illegal for moose to fuck each other 'in the street'... lots of outrageous things in the world. Moose who get it on when there's people around, liars and bullies and witches oh my, a good side of bluster with a european accent unrecognizable due to inebriety.

[jstrodel]

No necrophilia is bad.

[thesummerqueen]

I dont understand the OP's question.

[Violet]

No necrophilia is bad.

Shrimpies are too, I hear.

Lots of rich people eat shrimp.

Why aren't they fat? Might be dietary. Maybe they invented shrink ray, but that sounds like a rather unprincipled way to enter the gates of Heaven. Come to think- they do look a tad unscrupulous.



Why yes, sir... a healthy side of murder would go nicely with my burger. And might I request a drumstick to go?

[jstrodel]

Is that picture in your avatar really your picture?

[Violet]

Is that picture in your avatar really your picture?

No, but it is really my avatar's picture. There is a human upon Earth in 2012 who looks exactly like her, and I am sometimes her. I wouldn't consider her picture as my picture unless I am possessing her, of course

Simple answer: Yes, something around 8 months ago.