Why do feminists have such a bad reputation?

[My imaginary friend is GOD]

It was called the civil rights movement, not the privilege movement. Feminists want superiority and privilege. All they do is yell and genarally make a nuisance of themselves and make women look bad. They use shaming language against anybody who disagrees with them. They lack logic and consistency and they are childish and irresponsible because they don't like talking about false rape accusations, because, they claim, it is a distraction from real rape. Absolutely disgusting. That's why the vast majority of people don't take them seriously. They're a complete joke and they don't have the faintest idea why. They're just bitter people with tattoos, weird sexual orientations such as pansexual (I mean, what the fuck is that supposed to mean?), and a constant chip on their shoulder against men. They're just a complete waste of space. You don't have to be obnoxious to promote real equality, but that's not really what they want.

They do not want superiority and privilege. They want equality. It seems you have a much bigger chip on your shoulder, against women that you do not perceive as "feminine".

[Macky Avelli]

Do you believe that about the civil rights movement? Because there were certainly some aggressive people in that movement.

It was called the civil rights movement, not the privilege movement. Feminists want superiority and privilege. All they do is yell and genarally make a nuisance of themselves and make women look bad. They use shaming language against anybody who disagrees with them. They lack logic and consistency and they are childish and irresponsible because they don't like talking about false rape accusations, because, they claim, it is a distraction from real rape. Absolutely disgusting. That's why the vast majority of people don't take them seriously. They're a complete joke and they don't have the faintest idea why. They're just bitter people with tattoos, weird sexual orientations such as pansexual (I mean, what the fuck is that supposed to mean?), and a constant chip on their shoulder against men. They're just a complete waste of space. You don't have to be obnoxious to promote real equality, but that's not really what they want.

By the way, take the time to watch this video. It's about 7 mins long. It's a bunch of disgusting women staging a fake, insincere apology for joking about a story of a guy whose wife cut his dick off. The video of that is on youtube somewhere too, if you wish to search for it. Watch Sharon Osbourne as she barely tries to keep a straight face when apologising, and then later she composes herself and pretends to be really sorry. If it was about a guy who chopped off a woman's tits or mutilated her pussy, oh what howls and shrieks there would have been, but it was just a man, so who cares. This is the face of feminist equality. Fuck feminists, they're a bunch of disgusting excuses for human beings who have no interest in equality. I don't buy their bullshit for one second. And fuck their shaming language, people can very easily see right through it. Feminists will never be taken seriously because they're quite simply revolting and evil. Fuck them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKgwczruOSQ

---

It was called the civil rights movement, not the privilege movement. Feminists want superiority and privilege. All they do is yell and genarally make a nuisance of themselves and make women look bad. They use shaming language against anybody who disagrees with them. They lack logic and consistency and they are childish and irresponsible because they don't like talking about false rape accusations, because, they claim, it is a distraction from real rape. Absolutely disgusting. That's why the vast majority of people don't take them seriously. They're a complete joke and they don't have the faintest idea why. They're just bitter people with tattoos, weird sexual orientations such as pansexual (I mean, what the fuck is that supposed to mean?), and a constant chip on their shoulder against men. They're just a complete waste of space. You don't have to be obnoxious to promote real equality, but that's not really what they want.

They do not want superiority and privilege. They want equality. It seems you have a much bigger chip on your shoulder, against women that you do not perceive as "feminine".

Bollocks. I have no problem with people who wish to be different. I believe in equality, but feminists want everyone to agree with their way of life. I can very easily be friends with a woman who breaks the norms of femininity, as long as she's pleasant.

[Silver]

Lorena Bobbit is my hero.

[Macky Avelli]

Lorena Bobbit is my hero.

Why?

[The Grand Nudger]

It's pretty funny when some guys wife lobs off his gigglestick.....morbid pleasure - watching a train wreck sort of thing. Horrible.....but horribly ripe for funny.

[Gearbreak]

I'm actually not that attracted to feminine women. More balanced women. Maybe a little on the masculine side, as long as I can still tell that they're women. If she looks like a cute feminine male that's fine too. I got weird tastes though.

[festive1]

Lorena Bobbit is my hero.

Why?

Probably something to do with the whole battered wife taking back her power by cutting off her rapist husband's penis.

[The Grand Nudger]

I suppose it depends on what you consider "feminine" though, doesn't it. I come from a strongly matriarchal family - so my "feminine" isn't really much different from my "masculine" beyond "has a pussy" and "has a dick". You might be able to add loud to "feminine" and quiet to "masculine"......in my family...and in my perception of the two.

[Lord Privy Seal]

So, let me get this straight: feminists have a "bad reputation" (with whom?) because they get angry when members of the dominant Christian culture won't let them finish a sentence without interrupting, and they don't agree that they have a duty to conform to the dictates of the dominant Christian culture. Kinda like atheists then.

Also, I can't help but roll my eyes when Macky whines about feminists using the term "patriarchy"...and then informs us all that women need to dedicate themselves to being attractive to men like him, be "humble," get back in the kitchen, and make sandwiches when they're told. It also helps if women, while meeting men's demands for attractiveness and humility, make no demands of their own in return, like the good little Filipinas he makes reference to. No, no "patriarchy" there at all.

[Faith No More]

You're generalising and so am I. Generalisations are not inherently invalid. You're absolutely right, if all women became hideous, men would lower their standards in order to satisfy the natural male sex drive. It woule be like a hideous woman entering a prison. The men would shrug and say "meh, what the hell, it's female, it'll do", but really, men like pretty things, they like femininity, they're attracted to it, so it would merely be a case of lowering standards in the absence of anything better. Look around, one of the major assets that women have is their looks. If women want to neglect their looks and dress like slobs and let themselves go that's fine but as you can see most women do not choose to do that, and that is nature at work. Feminists live in their own reality, which is just as real as the reality that the rest of us live in, for them at least, but it ought to be emphasised that it's a very little world they live in compared to the world at large. The reality is that most men tend to have certain attributes, and most women do too. Feminism tries to force women to be different just for the sake of it. They're very aggressive and obnoxious people and if they really wanted equality it wouldn't be called feminism, it would just be called equality. Like I said before, give me a feminine, humble, modest, sweet girl any day of the week, they are far superior than those weird bulldyke feminists like the redhead in the video that I posted. Any movement or ism with people like that in it, sarcastic, nasty, aggressive people, any movement like that needs to be taken with a pinch of salt and kept at arms length as though it were a dirty rag on it's way to the bin.

What you fail to realize is that your generalization is to label all feminists as man-haters that simply want women to be superior to men. Many feminists simply want equality, and the reason they call themselves feminists is because the playing field needs to leveled towards the female side. You are using the most vocal of a group to denigrate the rest. That's akin to hating Christians because of Fred Phelps.

And I think your choice of word "bulldyke" is quite telling. I'm starting to think that you're just angry that some women don't think the world revolves around your penis.