Posts: 4535
Threads: 175
Joined: August 10, 2009
Reputation:
43
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
September 11, 2009 at 10:02 am
(September 10, 2009 at 8:43 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: It is impossible to verify this truth VOID. It is not verifiable. You believe in stuff you can empirically evidence. No thought required. That's fine, you just have no right to demand other have to stop thinking.
It's not verifiable because it isn't true, you can't test for the physical presence of an imaginary man!
.
Posts: 2375
Threads: 186
Joined: August 29, 2008
Reputation:
38
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
September 11, 2009 at 10:18 am
(September 10, 2009 at 8:43 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: It is impossible to verify this truth VOID. It is not verifiable. You believe in stuff you can empirically evidence. No thought required. That's fine, you just have no right to demand other have to stop thinking.
It is truly amazing how you twist and turn to try and stick by your position, but alas you contradict yourself. You also contradict reason.
You keep on using synonyms and then contradict the synonyms and pretend there's some important distinction that makes your words true.
Insisting on empirical evidence is the very essence of a thinking mind. You say faith is reasonable and we deny reason by wanting evidence. Once again, insisting empirical evidence is the essence of a reasonable mind. We "reason" what's true by demanding evidence before coming to a conclusion. All you ever do is insisted on what's true because you think it's true and can give no valid reasoning besides wiggling around and throwing up the faith card when it's convenient.
Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation:
145
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
September 11, 2009 at 11:47 am
Reason and faith are incompatible. WHen you pretend to mix the two: you get scientology. ^_^
Christianity presents itself as science, but it's not. The difference in time between Christianity and modern science is 1500+ years... there is no possibility of there being modern science in the bible. o.o
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
September 11, 2009 at 1:20 pm
There can be no reason for faith. That's an atheistic red herring. There is absolute reasoning for belief in God tho'.
Christian Science (another cult) presents itself as science. LOL @ the Scientology line
Christianity has always been about the human condition and never ever about science.
Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation:
145
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
September 11, 2009 at 1:45 pm
Exactly, and the human condition is irrationality, therefore Christianity has absolutely nothing to do with logic The absolute 'reasoning' is really just an absolute conviction in the assertion of an assumption. That is faith... and faith is to have absolute confidence in something. To have absolute confidence, you are committing a logical fallacy of circular logic, which has no logical basis.
So while it comes off as reasoning: "I do it because i do it, why? because i do it.", it is not reasoning. Try to avoid mistaking faith for reasoning
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
September 11, 2009 at 2:25 pm
(This post was last modified: September 11, 2009 at 2:26 pm by fr0d0.)
Beautifully written Sae
(September 11, 2009 at 1:45 pm)Saerules Wrote: Exactly, and the human condition is irrationality, therefore Christianity has absolutely nothing to do with logic Care to elaborate on the human condition? (and what about NOMA - u never did answer that??)
(September 11, 2009 at 1:45 pm)Saerules Wrote: The absolute 'reasoning' is really just an absolute conviction in the assertion of an assumption. That is faith... and faith is to have absolute confidence in something. To have absolute confidence, you are committing a logical fallacy of circular logic, which has no logical basis. I'd like to move on... I don't think faith is absolute confidence, if only that were possible!
Faith is certainly the conviction in the assertion of an assumption. "absolute reasoning" I think is a gross exaggeration (I hope I didn't say that! ).
(September 11, 2009 at 1:45 pm)Saerules Wrote: So while it comes off as reasoning: "I do it because i do it, why? because i do it.", it is not reasoning. Try to avoid mistaking faith for reasoning I never make blind statements like that. Faith is almost the opposite of reasoning, but behind faith... now there's a different matter.
Posts: 111
Threads: 2
Joined: April 12, 2009
Reputation:
4
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
September 11, 2009 at 3:01 pm
(September 10, 2009 at 4:58 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: (September 10, 2009 at 3:54 pm)amw79 Wrote: though as fr0do says above - "With faith it makes sense" - you just can't argue with a statement like that!!!
That is to crassly and superficially dismiss it.
Apologies, it was rather crass (but no less valid).
When trying to justify such an obvious paradox as the notion of the holy trinity, and then resorting to "with faith it makes sense", belittles the entire concept of debate and argument. By using this, anyone could apparently justify anything without either evidence, or more crucially - explanation.
It simply says "I understand this as I have faith. You don't have faith, so couldn't possibly understand"
This, to me, is immense arrogance, and singals the end of any possible debate - and as such - I stated "you just can't argue with a statement like that!!!"
That was merely a sidenote to the post, which was more generally about the trinity, and Jesus punturing a hole in the "non-temporal" god concept.
You can argue that god (in a deistic notion) is outside time, and outside space all day long, as its entirely unfalsifible, and unproveable. However if Jesus literally is god, as per the trinity concept - he clearly is temporal and in this universe.
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
September 11, 2009 at 3:13 pm
(September 11, 2009 at 2:25 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: "absolute reasoning" I think is a gross exaggeration (I hope I didn't say that! ).
You did, do you like contradicting yourself?
:
(September 11, 2009 at 1:20 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: There can be no reason for faith. That's an atheistic red herring. There is absolute reasoning for belief in God tho'.
(my bolding).
EvF
Posts: 14259
Threads: 48
Joined: March 1, 2009
Reputation:
80
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
September 11, 2009 at 4:07 pm
(This post was last modified: September 11, 2009 at 4:08 pm by fr0d0.)
(September 11, 2009 at 3:01 pm)amw79 Wrote: That was merely a sidenote to the post, which was more generally about the trinity, and Jesus punturing a hole in the "non-temporal" god concept.
You can argue that god (in a deistic notion) is outside time, and outside space all day long, as its entirely unfalsifible, and unproveable. However if Jesus literally is god, as per the trinity concept - he clearly is temporal and in this universe.
But that is the 100% man part
(September 11, 2009 at 3:13 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: (September 11, 2009 at 1:20 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: There can be no reason for faith. That's an atheistic red herring. There is absolute reasoning for belief in God tho'.
(my bolding).
Thanks Evie
Not absolute reasoning for faith. I feel redeemed
Posts: 111
Threads: 2
Joined: April 12, 2009
Reputation:
4
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
September 11, 2009 at 5:43 pm
(September 11, 2009 at 4:07 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: But that is the 100% man part
Aah, so god is non-temporal and transcendent, lying outside the physical universe, and out of reach of testability or evidence; but is also simultaneously 100% man in the form of Jesus, and as such is temporal and within the universe.
Anyone who can seriously entertain such a mess of internal contradiction, really must have left their brain at the front door.
You're quite right fr0do, I'm sure that "with faith, it makes sense" as you can decide to ignore the contradictions and just believe it 'because it is so'.
|