Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 26, 2024, 3:39 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
#31
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
(September 10, 2009 at 8:43 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: It is impossible to verify this truth VOID. It is not verifiable. You believe in stuff you can empirically evidence. No thought required. That's fine, you just have no right to demand other have to stop thinking.

It's not verifiable because it isn't true, you can't test for the physical presence of an imaginary man!
.
Reply
#32
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
(September 10, 2009 at 8:43 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: It is impossible to verify this truth VOID. It is not verifiable. You believe in stuff you can empirically evidence. No thought required. That's fine, you just have no right to demand other have to stop thinking.

It is truly amazing how you twist and turn to try and stick by your position, but alas you contradict yourself. You also contradict reason.

You keep on using synonyms and then contradict the synonyms and pretend there's some important distinction that makes your words true.

Insisting on empirical evidence is the very essence of a thinking mind. You say faith is reasonable and we deny reason by wanting evidence. Once again, insisting empirical evidence is the essence of a reasonable mind. We "reason" what's true by demanding evidence before coming to a conclusion. All you ever do is insisted on what's true because you think it's true and can give no valid reasoning besides wiggling around and throwing up the faith card when it's convenient.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin

::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :Tongueodcast:: Boston Atheists Report
Reply
#33
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
Reason and faith are incompatible. WHen you pretend to mix the two: you get scientology. ^_^

Christianity presents itself as science, but it's not. The difference in time between Christianity and modern science is 1500+ years... there is no possibility of there being modern science in the bible. o.o
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Reply
#34
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
There can be no reason for faith. That's an atheistic red herring. There is absolute reasoning for belief in God tho'.

Christian Science (another cult) presents itself as science. LOL @ the Scientology line Smile

Christianity has always been about the human condition and never ever about science.
Reply
#35
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
Exactly, and the human condition is irrationality, therefore Christianity has absolutely nothing to do with logic Smile The absolute 'reasoning' is really just an absolute conviction in the assertion of an assumption. That is faith... and faith is to have absolute confidence in something. To have absolute confidence, you are committing a logical fallacy of circular logic, which has no logical basis.

So while it comes off as reasoning: "I do it because i do it, why? because i do it.", it is not reasoning. Try to avoid mistaking faith for reasoning Smile
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Reply
#36
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
Beautifully written Sae Wink

(September 11, 2009 at 1:45 pm)Saerules Wrote: Exactly, and the human condition is irrationality, therefore Christianity has absolutely nothing to do with logic Smile
Care to elaborate on the human condition? (and what about NOMA - u never did answer that??)

(September 11, 2009 at 1:45 pm)Saerules Wrote: The absolute 'reasoning' is really just an absolute conviction in the assertion of an assumption. That is faith... and faith is to have absolute confidence in something. To have absolute confidence, you are committing a logical fallacy of circular logic, which has no logical basis.
I'd like to move on... I don't think faith is absolute confidence, if only that were possible!
Faith is certainly the conviction in the assertion of an assumption. "absolute reasoning" I think is a gross exaggeration (I hope I didn't say that! Smile).

(September 11, 2009 at 1:45 pm)Saerules Wrote: So while it comes off as reasoning: "I do it because i do it, why? because i do it.", it is not reasoning. Try to avoid mistaking faith for reasoning Smile
I never make blind statements like that. Faith is almost the opposite of reasoning, but behind faith... now there's a different matter.
Reply
#37
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
(September 10, 2009 at 4:58 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
(September 10, 2009 at 3:54 pm)amw79 Wrote: though as fr0do says above - "With faith it makes sense" - you just can't argue with a statement like that!!!

That is to crassly and superficially dismiss it.


Apologies, it was rather crass (but no less valid).

When trying to justify such an obvious paradox as the notion of the holy trinity, and then resorting to "with faith it makes sense", belittles the entire concept of debate and argument. By using this, anyone could apparently justify anything without either evidence, or more crucially - explanation.

It simply says "I understand this as I have faith. You don't have faith, so couldn't possibly understand"

This, to me, is immense arrogance, and singals the end of any possible debate - and as such - I stated "you just can't argue with a statement like that!!!"

That was merely a sidenote to the post, which was more generally about the trinity, and Jesus punturing a hole in the "non-temporal" god concept.

You can argue that god (in a deistic notion) is outside time, and outside space all day long, as its entirely unfalsifible, and unproveable. However if Jesus literally is god, as per the trinity concept - he clearly is temporal and in this universe.
Reply
#38
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
(September 11, 2009 at 2:25 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: "absolute reasoning" I think is a gross exaggeration (I hope I didn't say that! Smile).

You did, do you like contradicting yourself? Tongue

:

(September 11, 2009 at 1:20 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: There can be no reason for faith. That's an atheistic red herring. There is absolute reasoning for belief in God tho'.

(my bolding).

EvF
Reply
#39
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
(September 11, 2009 at 3:01 pm)amw79 Wrote: That was merely a sidenote to the post, which was more generally about the trinity, and Jesus punturing a hole in the "non-temporal" god concept.

You can argue that god (in a deistic notion) is outside time, and outside space all day long, as its entirely unfalsifible, and unproveable. However if Jesus literally is god, as per the trinity concept - he clearly is temporal and in this universe.

But that is the 100% man part
(September 11, 2009 at 3:13 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote:
(September 11, 2009 at 1:20 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: There can be no reason for faith. That's an atheistic red herring. There is absolute reasoning for belief in God tho'.

(my bolding).

Thanks Evie

Not absolute reasoning for faith. I feel redeemed Big Grin
Reply
#40
RE: The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?
(September 11, 2009 at 4:07 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: But that is the 100% man part

Aah, so god is non-temporal and transcendent, lying outside the physical universe, and out of reach of testability or evidence; but is also simultaneously 100% man in the form of Jesus, and as such is temporal and within the universe.

Anyone who can seriously entertain such a mess of internal contradiction, really must have left their brain at the front door.

You're quite right fr0do, I'm sure that "with faith, it makes sense" as you can decide to ignore the contradictions and just believe it 'because it is so'.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Serious] The Trinity zwanzig 127 7410 January 23, 2021 at 10:31 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The Holy War Johanabrahams 105 8533 July 17, 2020 at 9:11 am
Last Post: brewer
  Refuting trinity. Mystic 35 5348 April 8, 2018 at 2:15 pm
Last Post: JackRussell
  The Trinity Doctrine: Help me out, Christians GrandizerII 169 18028 February 9, 2018 at 8:48 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Is the Holy Spirit Misleading You? Rhondazvous 251 82833 July 12, 2017 at 10:17 pm
Last Post: Astonished
  The Trinity and Mary vorlon13 52 14540 May 30, 2017 at 12:28 pm
Last Post: Lek
  The Holy Bible - fact or fiction? val5662 101 13242 March 28, 2017 at 7:54 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  10 apologist mistakes about trinity Mystic 21 4125 April 2, 2016 at 5:34 pm
Last Post: athrock
  A doctrine of alienation Mystical 39 6398 September 23, 2015 at 11:52 am
Last Post: TheRocketSurgeon
  Holy Tree QuarkDriven 28 6853 July 23, 2015 at 12:30 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)