Posts: 12
Threads: 1
Joined: October 6, 2009
Reputation:
0
RE: Evidence?
October 6, 2009 at 5:50 pm
can you describe to me any proof that god doesnt exist
and there is no evidence towards evolution only similarities amungst various amount of species
Posts: 397
Threads: 11
Joined: December 20, 2008
Reputation:
12
RE: Evidence?
October 6, 2009 at 5:54 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2009 at 5:56 pm by lilphil1989.)
(October 6, 2009 at 5:50 pm)zoso Wrote: can you describe to me any proof that god doesnt exist
and there is no evidence towards evolution only similarities amungst various amount of species
Can you provide any proof that vengeful Thor isn't on his way to you now, to hammer your blasphemous hide into oblivion?
I suppose there's also no evidence to support Newton's theory of Universal Gravitation (a good approximation to General Relativity under reasonable conditions), other that stuff falling to the floor?
In response to your previous post (you're posting faster than I can keep up) yes I agree that evolution by natural selection is a theory. I suggest you go here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
to help you to understand what that means.
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
Posts: 12
Threads: 1
Joined: October 6, 2009
Reputation:
0
RE: Evidence?
October 6, 2009 at 5:57 pm
i have read the post on the tectonic plates i can direct the line from the diagram.
but on the depth of the ocean map it shows that the "crack" is 4000m below sea level and the ocean next to it is 11000 below sea level. why arnt the rest of the plates visable on ocean depth like this. why is this "crack" so clear?
Posts: 12
Threads: 1
Joined: October 6, 2009
Reputation:
0
RE: Evidence?
October 6, 2009 at 5:59 pm
yes but newton discovered how gravity works not why it does thats why he stayeda true christian all his life because he could never answer it
Posts: 397
Threads: 11
Joined: December 20, 2008
Reputation:
12
RE: Evidence?
October 6, 2009 at 6:00 pm
(October 6, 2009 at 5:57 pm)zoso Wrote: i have read the post on the tectonic plates i can direct the line from the diagram.
but on the depth of the ocean map it shows that the "crack" is 4000m below sea level and the ocean next to it is 11000 below sea level. why arnt the rest of the plates visable on ocean depth like this. why is this "crack" so clear?
I'm going to create a new thread for this, in the science section. We'll carry on our discussion of evolution and plate tectonics there, since you've hijacked someone else's thread with irrelevant material and it's going on for quite a few posts.
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
Posts: 1694
Threads: 24
Joined: August 28, 2008
Reputation:
22
RE: Evidence?
October 6, 2009 at 6:14 pm
fr0d0,you said "Again you attack my belief as if millenia of eeking out the truth is somehow invalid because it doesn't employ scientific verification where that is shown not to apply."
The so called eeking out truth is invalid if it is being sought in the realms of superstition based on ignorance and fear. The Christian worldview is the same as all the former religions that preceeded it. When tragedy strikes a tribe;God is angry, sacrifices must be made to gain his favor (O.T.), when good things happen; God is happy. Judaism follows the same formula of all religious mythologies of old, is this a coincidence?
Sin+sacrifice=redemption before Christ it was various animal sacrifices to appease or keep Jehova happy. The sacrifices were not sufficient enough to completely redeem man before god so then we needed a more perfect sacrifice. In comes Christ. Christianity is nothing more than an updated version of this age old formula.